Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 January 19

January 19 edit

Template:Campaignbox Franco-Siamese War edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A) Per recent Requested Move, this wasn't really a war, exactly - closer to gunboat diplomacy where the French got what they wanted off some casual shelling. Murder, sure, but it didn't quite turn into a war. B ) Even if thought of as a war, these articles have all been redlinks for 10+ years, and always will be - there simply isn't anything to say about them. The sole bluelink, Paknam incident, is already linked in the main article - no need for a navbox for it. SnowFire (talk) 00:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template creator has been blocked for 9+ years, but will ping @Paul 012 and Srnec: who participated in recent RM. SnowFire (talk) 00:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Useless. Templates exist stricly 'as needed'. Srnec (talk) 00:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:56, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Electoral history/doc edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A doc page for a template that does not exist and has one edit over a month ago. Gonnym (talk) 13:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DYK-portal edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basically like Template:DYK talk, but for portals.

This template seems to be exclusively used to recognize entries from Portal:Paleozoic/DYK. It is contributing to banner blindness. This doesn't need its own template. This could in theory be integrated into Template:Article history but I doubt it's worth the hassle. Schierbecker (talk) 04:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Note that the portal is also up for MFD by the nominator, but even if the portal is kept, we don't need a whole-ass banner declaring a single incoming link. "What links here" routinely shows hundreds of incoming links for articles already, there's no reason to call out any such link as particularly important or relevant. (The sole exception MIGHT be if an article is being used elsewhere by {{excerpt}}, but that's a very unusual case and not comparable to Just Another Link.) SnowFire (talk) 00:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sindh Tourism Development Corporation edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NAVBOX. Zherr (talk) 04:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.