Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 5

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/London Underground Frietjes (talk) 22:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox ice hockey team. plicit 23:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox OHA team with Template:Infobox ice hockey team.
Redundant template that can be fully expressed with {{Infobox ice hockey team}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN. Simply a list of European national ice hockey teams with one link and many red links. Not needed. {{Men's national ice hockey teams}} allows for navigation between national teams. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:50, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NENAN. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No links to articles other than subject. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:20, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rugby league runners-up squads (part 3)

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per discussion at WP:RL, these kinds of navboxes are considered excessive due to template creep. This is a continuation of the TfD here. J Mo 101 (talk) 18:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rugby league runners-up squads (part 2)

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 09:16, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per discussion at WP:RL, these kinds of navboxes are considered excessive due to template creep. This is a continuation of the TfD here. J Mo 101 (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. Runner-up teams are not a championship team. They are not notable enough in any regard. There's no need to create navboxes for them. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per nom, no need for navboxes for second place teams. Frietjes (talk) 19:31, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note - I'm on board with them being deleted, I just feel an unintended consequence is where these have not only been used as traditional navboxes for player articles, but also for within the finals themselves. These would have likely been a shortcut to having these details written out to display for the teams that took the final. I'm sure that no-one wants to remove that level of detail from within the finals themselves.Fleets (talk) 18:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    There are sources available where the team details can be added to the articles. Nthep (talk) 19:20, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use template. Substitute and delete. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:59, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use templates. Substitute and replace. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 12. plicit 14:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Copied from Template:Infobox recurring event without any attribution. Swapped use of this at User:Goscusa/sandbox with {{Infobox convention}}. No other obvious use for this. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:20, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Copied from Template:Infobox recurring event without any attribution. No other obvious use for this. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Copied from Template:Infobox recurring event without any attribution. No other obvious use for this. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 12. plicit 09:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 14. plicit 12:08, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).