Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 July 30

All Z-number templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:15, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:I Can See Your Voice series. Izno (talk) 21:29, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only two seasons ran for the show. Linked to only three articles but falls short of its navigational purpose. Similar to the Dutch version template that was deleted on July 21. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:11, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:45, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The overall table is used on one page while the Eastern and Western templates are used only on two pages. Propose substituting the information where the templates are used since these templates won't be updated regularly. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Creator not notified, relisting to extend the comment period
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:19, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:50, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use templates that should be substituted where used on the Water polo at the 1952 Summer Olympics article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Creator not notified, relisting to extend comment period
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:15, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:01, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use templates that should be substituted where used on the Basketball at the 1952 Summer Olympics article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Creator not notified, relisting to extend comment period
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Should be on the various nation pages as well, but substituting and deleting the templates should be fine. (I think we tend to use section transclusion now for things like that.) -- Jonel (Speak to me) 21:40, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:15, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:15, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:18, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Flinstone's family tree is not as confusing as a family tree like the Skywalker family tree. Also all of the characters are neatly listed at Template:The Flintstones, so this really is not necessary. Finally, the entire template relies on two sources, one of which takes up a grand majority of the citations, and is strangly a site for lawyers. Overall, it is kind of pointless. (Oinkers42) (talk) 17:56, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:03, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

redundant navigation to Template:Maya Frietjes (talk) 15:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after replacing, refactoring, etc. as suggested Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:14, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These navboxes are placed on constituency articles but are a massive bloat on some articles (see Northern Ireland (European Parliament constituency)) as they try and be both a navbox and content. I'm proposing the following:

Support I think the template you've created would do a better job for all the former constituencies and it should have sections for the year range for each constituency listed above in the templates. It will be bloated to have it by country as there is a lot right now for the UK. I don't think the last option would make a ton of sense since the navbox option would in my view do a better job of linking the information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A navboxere is a tool only for navigation so adding the year range for each constituency is both unnecessary and will also make it bloated (and of course, that information would be hidden from half of our readers using mobile). That is why I said that if the ranges are needed, it should be replaced with a table in the European Parliament constituency article. Gonnym (talk) 09:26, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 6. Izno (talk) 01:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).