Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 August 6

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< August 5 August 7 >

August 6 edit

Template:Righeira singles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant. Creator seems to have misunderstood the purpose of a navbox – there are only two songs with an article: these songs could just as easily be added to the existing Template:Righeira, no need to have a separate navbox for them. Richard3120 (talk) 19:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not enough links. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:43, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unlikely to contain enough links or be of use; not really a navbox at all. — CVValue (talk) 15:14, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Righeira (Righeira album) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:43, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant. Creator seems to have misunderstood the purpose of a navbox – there is only one song from the album with an article: this song and the discography could just as easily be added to the existing Template:Righeira, no need to have a separate navbox for the album. Richard3120 (talk) 19:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not enough links. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:43, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unlikely to contain enough links or be of use; not really a navbox at all. — CVValue (talk) 15:14, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Righeira filmography and videography edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant. Creator seems to have misunderstood the purpose of a navbox – there is only one blue link in this template, so nothing else to link to. Richard3120 (talk) 19:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not enough links. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:43, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unlikely to contain enough links or be of use; not really a navbox at all. — CVValue (talk) 15:14, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Righeira compilations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant. Creator seems to have misunderstood the purpose of a navbox – there are no links at all in this template, and there are unlikely to be in the future, as no notability has been demonstrated for these albums. Richard3120 (talk) 19:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not enough links. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:43, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unlikely to contain enough links or be of use; not really a navbox at all. — CVValue (talk) 15:14, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Righeira albums edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant. Creator seems to have misunderstood the purpose of a navbox – there are no links at all in this template, and there are unlikely to be in the future, as all these albums have recently been deleted at AfD due to lack of notability. Richard3120 (talk) 19:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not enough links. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:43, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unlikely to contain enough links or be of use; not really a navbox at all. — CVValue (talk) 15:14, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MetaSidebar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:17, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We have plenty of other templates to make floating boxes off to the right without a template being confused for {{sidebar}}. Given how few uses there are and the fact this template is implemented in plain wikitext, this template should be substed into its uses and deleted. Izno (talk) 02:33, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And also {{examples sidebar}} which uses this template. --Izno (talk) 02:35, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:43, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete, I haven't spent a lot of time thinking about these things, but at a glance it doesn't seem compelling enough at any level to justify its existence. — MaxEnt 22:44, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:World laws pertaining to animal sentience edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 16. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:17, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sports equipment edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:17, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Too loosely connected for a navbox, and only contains a small part of Category:Sports equipment. Many sports are not mentioned, e.g. athletics, cycling, skiing. Expanding to be more complete would be unwieldy. More narrow subjects like balls and sports footwear might have individual navboxes. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:33, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Too basic or simplistic for a navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:40, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I don't think this template is "too basic", neither it needs to be eliminated, but proceed as you wish, whatever. Fma12 (talk) 09:33, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The template seems too long to be a navbox and is probably more destined for a list article. — CVValue (talk) 14:08, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Team table player edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:59, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused set of templates. People apparently prefer to use {{Football squad player}} and similar templates instead. No substantive edits since 2014. Changes to MW have made this set of templates a maintenance burden; it's better to just delete them. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:52, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_August_6&oldid=1039141639"