Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 26

< April 25	April 27 >

April 26 edit

Template:2018 Uzbekistan Super League tables edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2018 Uzbekistan Super League tables (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:2005 Tippeligaen table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:1996–97 French Division 1 table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

merged (with attribution) with the parent article Frietjes (talk) 20:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Gonnym (talk) 09:43, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:19, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Giant Snowman 09:21, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NBL AA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:41, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NBL AA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NBL WA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused templates which are just plain text names. No need for a template for that even if it were used. Gonnym (talk) 19:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - completely useless -- Whpq (talk) 22:35, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mahoran status referendum, 2009 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:41, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mahoran status referendum, 2009 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused referendum template since 2009 Mahoran status referendum uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 19:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Curaçao status referendum, 2009 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:42, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Curaçao status referendum, 2009 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused referendum template since 2009 Curaçao status referendum uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 19:37, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Curaçao status referendum, 2005 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:42, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Curaçao status referendum, 2005 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused referendum template since 2005 Curaçao status referendum uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 19:36, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Curaçao status referendum, 1993 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:42, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Curaçao status referendum, 1993 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused referendum template since 1993 Curaçao status referendum uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 19:35, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Podium-1-bb edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:42, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Podium-1-bb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Podium-4-bb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Podium-4-bb-sf (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused baseball templates. Gonnym (talk) 19:16, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Consider nominating Template:Podium-2-bb and Template:Podium-3-bb once a replacement is found. I think something like that already exists. BLAIXX 13:49, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PlayerUS edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:42, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PlayerUS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template with also no regular incoming links which makes it seem like this might have never been actually used. Gonnym (talk) 19:14, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to {{Player||US}} (Template:Player). BLAIXX 13:40, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SLPB color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:43, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SLPB color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused baseball color template, but even if it were used, it should have used {{Baseball color}} instead. Gonnym (talk) 19:10, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BaseballPostseason edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:43, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BaseballPostseason (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template with one major contribution in 2012 when it was created. Gonnym (talk) 19:05, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Template:Baseballbox. BLAIXX 13:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MLBswitch edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:41, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MLBswitch (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:24, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Gonnym (talk) 19:19, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not only is it unused, but it's purpose is a clear as pea soup. The documentation doesn't even say why it exists, or what it does. Makes it pretty useless. oknazevad (talk) 23:59, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – It looks like it would be more useful in reverse, but someone could create that template if ever needed. BLAIXX 13:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).