Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 October 7

October 7

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:00, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All of these templates are either unused or used only in one broken sandbox. Their existence just clutters the category they are in and adds confusion for people trying to work out the template system for these lines. Gareth (talk) 16:11, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:38, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused outside of one talkpage and out of date Gareth (talk) 15:59, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:57, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As per the deletion of Template:Strong oppose, this vote symbol is also against consensus. This should also be salted like the others. Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:32, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:56, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use unused templates. I have already substed them into relevant articles. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:45, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are too many pages and I can't tag them all! Please help out. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:06, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
All have now been tagged using AWB but I don't know if XFDCloser will be able to handle closing a discussion with more than sixty templates. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:29, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There are still around 1,000 of these 2018 Asian Games single-use templates left but over the coming days, I will be nominating them for deletion but this is enough for today. There are none of these templates left from 2014 Asian Games. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:19, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).