Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 February 21

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< February 20 February 22 >

February 21 edit

Template:Academy of Magical Arts Comedy Magician of the Year edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; and the notability of this award is not clear since there is no parent article listing the award winners Frietjes (talk) 22:33, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Abkhazian Railway edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused and generally duplicates Template:Adler-Sukhumi railway line Frietjes (talk) 22:31, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Thailand at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

as far as I can tell, no other country has a navbox listing all the participants at the youth Olympics, which is excessive. if anyone wants to see the list, they can navigate to Thailand at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics and Thailand at the 2014 Summer Youth Olympics, and note that the medallists are already listed in Template:Youth Olympic medalists for Thailand as well. Frietjes (talk) 13:39, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Micronesian political parties edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged BladesGodric 15:40, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"There are no political parties in Micronesia." Provides no useful navigation between topics directly related to the topic. Links in the header and footer are tangential only. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 11:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kiryat Motzkin – Haifa line edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Re-creation is allowed, but with references/proper sources. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged BladesGodric 15:39, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; still no evidence that the route exists per the source at the foot of the routemap [1] Frietjes (talk) 18:05, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It's referenced from Talk:Lev HaMifratz railway station and Talk:Haifa Bat Galim railway station. Both of those articles are stubs, so apparently there's some intention to use it at a future date. Also, the link at the bottom is a link to put the route into context in the network, not a reference. (Besides, it's a suburban commuter route, not an intercity line, so why should it be on the map of intercity routes?) And finally, Frietjes nominated this template for deletetion less than 60 days ago where the decision was to keep, supported by a deletion review. The nominator should have relisted at the time if they didn't agree with the original decision, they should have relisted at the time. Useddenim (talk) 11:37, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Useddenim, please provide a link to a reliable external source showing that the line exists. there is still no evidence that the route exists per the source at the foot of the routemap [2]. Frietjes (talk) 14:52, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, appears to be either a hoax, the line no longer exists, or is simply not notable enough to be put on the maps. In any case, we don't need a map for it. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Frietjes: How many times do I have to explain that it's not a reference, but a link to key the route's location within the network? Useddenim (talk) 11:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
the fact that you are unable to provide a reference speaks volumes. Frietjes (talk) 14:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Plastikspork: That's a harsh and prejudiced interpretation. I have asked Image of me (the template's creator) to give us the origin of the route. Useddenim (talk) 11:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 00:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Salvador Mejía Alejandre edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TV producer is not primary creator per WP:FILMNAV. --woodensuperman 12:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 00:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Country data Odessa People's Republic edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There was no such country as Odessa People's Republic, nobody even proclaimed this. This template should be deleted. Shmurak (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 00:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As per nominator's rationale. Borsoka (talk) 06:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Titled noble families in the Kingdom of Hungary edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged BladesGodric 15:39, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The template is aimed at listing all noble families that held a hereditary title (baron, count, duke) in the Kingdom of Hungary. First of all, there were hundreds of such families, as it is demonstrated by the well-referenced (and still incomplete) List of titled noble families in the Kingdom of Hungary, so the creation of a complete, but handy template can hardly be imagined. Secondly, the template contains OR that hardly can be continuously fixed. Borsoka (talk) 05:57, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The template isn't only incomplete but confusing. I was one of the editors who tried to fix this template years ago, but it was futile. Fakirbakir (talk) 20:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, agree with Fakirbakir. A completely ready list would be more appropriate. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_21&oldid=828336691"