Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 January 14

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 13 January 15 >

January 14 edit

Template:ProSieben Shows (current and upcoming) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 05:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. These templates should only be used to group original programming produced by a network per conventional usage and per WP:NOTTVGUIDE. -- Rob Sinden (talk) 09:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Periglio/Reject edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 27. Primefac (talk) 06:49, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused. Frietjes (talk) 00:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CyMoBase edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 27. Primefac (talk) 06:49, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused. Frietjes (talk) 00:37, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Prism/Lights edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 27. Primefac (talk) 06:49, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused. Frietjes (talk) 00:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NewyorkadamGA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 27. Primefac (talk) 06:49, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

should be moved to userspace? Frietjes (talk) 00:29, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite Hochreiter:2000book edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 27. Primefac (talk) 06:49, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and not needed. Frietjes (talk) 00:22, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Denmark edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Jan 27. Primefac (talk) 06:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Three year versions of a pageant, all three AfD'ed. Two of them Crystal balls. The Banner talk 00:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional delete If the articles are deleted, then this template should go to but not before....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
By now emptied by a third party. The Banner talk 16:03, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Barbara (WVS) friendly med ref reminder edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to {{Friendly med ref reminder}}. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

not sure why this is in template space if it is named for a particular user. Frietjes (talk) 00:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Move to user or project space —PC-XT+ 07:54, 17 January 2016 (UTC) or to Template:Friendly med ref reminder per below —PC-XT+ 14:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • WT:WikiProject Medicine has been notified of this discussion —PC-XT+ 07:54, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to user space. Easy solution. No need to delete. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:43, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't much care where it ends up, but is there some policy that says that this name is actually a problem? I'm not aware of any... WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:11, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - and rename if you would like. The name is irrelevant and was used to let other editors know where it came from. This is a template designed to let new medical editors know why their edits were reverted. I have tried to address the concern that I have about the alarming number of editors who edit a medical article and have their edit reverted with a typically terse edit summary and a referral to a page of guidelines. New editors don't know the guidelines most of the time. There is no reason to delete this template. Its purpose is to work to retain editors and its deletion would be unfortunate. There should be no problem with a template created by one editor. This template can be used by anyone. If the problem that the template 'appears' to be for one editor is that the template has my name in it, then the solution is to rename the template. I also thought that any problems that someone had with an article/template/file/image/ or other content would first be discussed with the editor that created such content. Keeping this template, under whatever name anyone chooses does no harm to the encyclopedia - deleting it would hinder efforts to retain medical editors. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) (talk) 12:26, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep in mainspace, but rename to Template:Friendly med ref reminder. The text "my talk page" could use a parameter to link to the talk page of whoever uses it. This is an excellent template to leave a message on an editor's talk page. Peter coxhead (talk) 14:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename as suggested and keep in mainspace. A very useful template, and thanks, Barbara, for making it. DGG ( talk ) 20:11, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Agree with most recent comments. The template is a big improvement over the current less-specific, less-friendly varieties. Perhaps renaming will make other editors more likely to use it. Thanks Barbara (WVS). Ajpolino (talk) 00:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Denimadept/Da-delete1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Vanjagenije (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

not sure why this is in template space? Frietjes (talk) 00:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's in my personal space. I use it occasionally. - Denimadept (talk) 09:48, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
then move it out of template space. Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As I recall, it was moved there from where it was originally. What's the problem? Low on disk? - Denimadept (talk) 02:10, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If that is done, will it still be usable as a template? - Denimadept (talk) 09:15, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, {{User:Denimadept/Template:Da-delete1}} is how you do it. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 10:35, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I moved it. It doesn't seem to work now. I'll move it back if I can't get it to work. - Denimadept (talk) 01:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Try transcluding it using {{:User:Denimadept/Da-delete1}} with a colon at the start. —PC-XT+ 01:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, the documentation template you are using doesn't work in userspace. We could make documentation for it... —PC-XT+ 02:02, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Denimadept, did my edit of the doc template help? —PC-XT+ 02:29, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
PC-XT, well, it looks good. Where it doesn't appear to be working is with the {{tltts}} template in my User page. - Denimadept (talk) 05:30, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see, Denimadept. That template doesn't support userspace, either. Well, I just added support if you use |NSprefix=User: in the template code. It's a bit experimental... —PC-XT+ 06:39, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it needs the extra parameter, anymore. Let me know if it still won't work. —PC-XT+ 07:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
PC-XT, that seems to have worked! TYVM. - Denimadept (talk) 07:13, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Great! That's two more templates that support userspace! YVW. —PC-XT+ 07:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename per IP —PC-XT+ 23:46, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • If there are no problems, we can probably speedy-delete the redirect and close this, now. —PC-XT+ 07:34, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_January_14&oldid=1074062729"