Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 February 15
February 15
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Reflistp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Now redundant: The function to view references within a section preview, previously provided by this template, is now provided automatically. See [1] : Noyster (talk), 21:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as no longer needed, though I'm very glad we had things like this before the "Preview of references" section! —PC-XT+ 23:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, and let me say that the the auto-preview feature is one of the most welcome changes in years! I don't know anything about template deletion, but can someone nominate Template:Reflistpx as well? EEng 00:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Vacations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Orphan Template Ninney (talk) 06:38, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as this seems to violate several points of WP:NAVBOX —PC-XT+ 23:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as incoherent. --Rob Sinden (talk) 16:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
WP:EXISTING -- The navbox is only used in the 2014 VMI Keydets season article, making it hard to navigate. The standard for this type of thing would be a standings template (e.g. Template:Standings Table Start), if there were season articles that existed, which there are not any. Also fails WP:NAVBOX No. 4: "There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template". 🇺🇸 Corkythehornetfan 🇺🇸 01:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as premature —PC-XT+ 23:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
WP:EXISTING -- The navbox is only used in the 2013 Conference season article, making it hard to navigate. The standard for this type of thing would be a standings template (e.g. Template:Standings Table Start), if there were season articles that existed, which there are not any. 🇺🇸 Corkythehornetfan 🇺🇸 00:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as premature —PC-XT+ 23:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).