Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 April 8

< April 7	April 9 >

April 8 edit

Template:Holocaust denial edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izkala (talk) 00:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Holocaust denial (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A template likely created in good faith but which clearly runs afoul of WP:NLT. Ad Orientem (talk) 13:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete per nom, and if anything should be speedy deleted without waiting the full seven days. --Gimubrc (talk) 19:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but no need to rush a speedy since it already has been removed from talk pages. VQuakr (talk) 19:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Clearly a legal threat. --Dmol (talk) 21:38, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't see how this would possibly be useful. More seriously, anybody who applied this template anywhere would risk being indefinitely blocked for issuing legal threats. Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PHINMA Education Network Inc. edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 04:09, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PHINMA Education Network Inc. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Delete. Fails WP:NAVBOX criterion 4. The subject of the template does not have an article. Sixth o f March 03:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete, no parent article. Frietjes (talk) 18:32, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sahaba edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisting here. ~ Rob^Talk 15:39, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sahaba (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A template makes no sense for a long list. Besides, there is List of Sahabah and Category:Sahabah. Al-Andalusi (talk) 20:59, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given that this template has more than a few transclusions, this needs further discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob^Talk 01:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).