Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 18

< September 17	September 19 >

September 18 edit

Template:Frame edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fuhghettaboutit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:06, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Frame (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to {{quote box}} and {{image frame}}. I replaced it in about five articles. Frietjes (talk) 17:12, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment why the hell is this (indefinitely) edit protected? It was protected on the same day it was created, with no intermediate edits registered. -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 06:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete unexplained undocumented template that was protected for no reason and unused outside of the creator's userspace. Clearly abusive use of private templates. This is not a high profile template, this is has no history of vandalism. Wikipedia should have no editprotected walled gardens. -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 06:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ever occur to anyone to just ask me before nominating? Before assuming bad faith? Everything you might want to know is here followed by here. Just forgot this one.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aligarh edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge {{Aligarh}} into {{Aligarh Muslim University}}. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 05:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aligarh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Aligarh Muslim University (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Aligarh with Template:Aligarh Muslim University.
Redundant to have two templates for one and the same university. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Washington metropolitan area roads edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ Rob^Talk 04:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Washington metropolitan area roads (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per past precedent displayed multiple times (as illustrated here), this template is unneeded because categories can better handle the need and the template pollutes the What Links Here function in the articles included. Dough4872 02:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creator's response Go ahead and delete it. Have fun.Scott218 (talk) 03:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as per my previous votes. Charlotte Allison (Allen/Morriswa) (talk) 10:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 15:37, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per precedents. V C 01:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).