Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 September 18

< September 17	September 19 >

September 18 edit

Template:Top4 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:47, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Top4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Mid4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

nearly unused and redundant to {{col-4}}/{{col-begin}} or one of the many other Table and column templates. Frietjes (talk) 20:55, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it's an import from Wiktionary; so will be redundant to the Wikipedia-way, as it is the Wiktionary-way -- 70.51.46.146 (talk) 04:56, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Redundant. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:21, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant per nom —PC -XT + 17:14, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Barbecue sauces edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Barbecue sauces (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per template guidelines, "Templates should not be used to create lists of links to other articles when a category, list page, or 'See also' section list can perform the same function." This template would be better implemented by categories and lists. The current one appears to be a confusion between commercial brands and sauce styles...many not actually belonging to the list. We don't need a template to navigate commercial brands.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 18:02, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NOTDUP, relative to the existence of Category:Barbecue sauces. WP:NOTDUP states "It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template which all cover the same topic. These redundant systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative." It's possible that the template guidelines page may be outdated regarding this matter. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:14, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NOTDUP, as that has been the prevailing consensus in recent discussions —PC -XT + 17:30, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:From Commons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:36, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:From Commons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Deleted on Commons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:From Commons with Template:Deleted on Commons.
These seem to have the same purpose. We don't need both of them. Stefan2 (talk) 17:02, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge have a selector to choose the smaller or larger format. There is a slight difference in usage, as "from Commons" is for a file that is incompatible with Commons being copied to en.wiki, while "deleted on Commons" could be used for files that existed on both Commons and en.wiki subsequently deleted on Commons (this could be the result of a transfer to commons, then deletion on commons while the en.wiki one wasn't yet deleted). -- 70.51.46.146 (talk) 03:30, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Why is it necessary to include that difference in the template or if a user attempted to move a file to Commons which does not belong there? If a file on Commons is uploaded to English Wikipedia, this is typically indicated in the "source" parameter of the {{Information}} template. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as the overlap of purpose seems substantial —PC -XT + 21:07, 27 September 2014 (UTC) 05:03, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Union Flag variants 1606-1801 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:53, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Union Flag variants 1606-1801 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

subst and delete this is a single use template, only used in the article Union Jack, so should be directly coded into the article. 70.51.46.146 (talk) 10:54, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete as single-use template —PC -XT + 21:15, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Strloc prefix edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Strloc prefix (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to Template:Str left, and only used on 2 pages in userspace (not counting itself) Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:43, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it would be nice if this could be copyed to an open source code repository, for use on wikis that don't do LUA -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 11:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then copy it to one. You don't need permission to do that. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant on Wikipedia —PC -XT + 21:16, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:GAsym edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GAsym (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless wrapper around File:Symbol support vote.svg. Unused except in demonstrations of itself. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused/redundant —PC -XT + 21:24, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Gapnum/dec edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gapnum/dec (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:38, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it would be nice if this could be copyed to an open source code repository, for use on wikis that don't do LUA -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 11:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then copy it to one. You don't need permission to do that. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unused on Wikipedia —PC -XT + 21:39, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ensp edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ensp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:37, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it would be nice if this could be copyed to an open source code repository, for use on wikis that don't do LUA -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 11:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then copy it to one. You don't need permission to do that. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rnd/min edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:41, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rnd/min (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant to Template:Rnd now that it uses Lua Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:32, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it would be nice if this could be copyed to an open source code repository, for use on wikis that don't do LUA -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 11:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then copy it to one. You don't need permission to do that. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unused/redundant on Wikipedia —PC -XT + 21:44, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Str endswith short edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:40, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Str endswith short (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer useful now that Template:Str endswith uses Lua Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it would be nice if this could be copyed to an open source code repository, for use on wikis that don't do LUA -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 11:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then copy it to one. You don't need permission to do that. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unuseful/redundant on Wikipedia —PC -XT + 21:51, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Str find max edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Str find max (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant to Template:Str find Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it would be nice if this could be copyed to an open source code repository, for use on wikis that don't do LUA -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 11:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then copy it to one. You don't need permission to do that. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unused/redundant on Wikipedia —PC -XT + 21:53, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Strfind quick edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:38, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Strfind quick (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant to Template:Str find Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:23, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it would be nice if this could be copyed to an open source code repository, for use on wikis that don't do LUA -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 11:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then copy it to one. You don't need permission to do that. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unused/redundant on Wikipedia —PC -XT + 21:58, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Htcm edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:36, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Htcm (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant to Template:Convert Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:17, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: couldn't (shouldn't?) the same be said for {{Height}}?--Gibson Flying V (talk) 03:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not the "unused" part, at least. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep by author. Per the documentation, the Template:Htcm provides a user-friendly way to specify heights in centimetres, providing auto-fixed parameters if mistakes are saved. By comparison, the Template:Convert does not yet provide auto-fixing of parameters, nor does Template:Height, while Template:Htcm has been designed as the next-generation form of {Height}. Hence, keep Template:Htcm as providing special functionality and error-correction of parameters, as the features of Template:Convert are later improved to better reflect the real-world handling of measurement conversions such as height. -Wikid77 (talk) 22:28, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Autofixing and error correction are REALLY BAD and should NEVER be used. A page not providing any information to a reader because of an error is bad, but a page providing misinformation to a reader because of an error is much worse. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:41, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete, we should really be using {{convert}} instead. as far as {{height}} goes, it should probably be deleted as well, but that one has been around for much longer. Frietjes (talk) 23:54, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as errors should be apparent on a wiki, so everyone can see them, and someone is more likely to fix it —PC -XT + 22:10, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Numsense edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move to userspace Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Numsense (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant now that Template:Precision uses Lua Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep by author. Per the documentation, the Template:Numsense provides a more useful check for precision, based on the number sense of an amount. By comparison, the Template:Precision only provides a strict engineering view of the precision level, and Template:Convert actually handles some units in the manner of Template:Numsense. Hence, keep Template:Numsense as providing a special functionality, as the features of Template:Convert are improved to better reflect the real-world handling of measurement conversions. -Wikid77 (talk) 22:22, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete, we don't need it. Frietjes (talk) 23:54, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy or delete as it doesn't seem needed as a stand-alone template at this time, but could possibly be an example of changes to other templates —PC -XT + 22:13, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Doc short edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Doc short (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Obsolete now that Template:Documentation uses Lua Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unneeded —PC -XT + 22:17, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Has char edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Has char (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Obsolete now that Template:Str find uses Lua Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:14, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it would be nice if this could be copyed to an open source code repository, for use on wikis that don't do LUA -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 11:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then copy it to one. You don't need permission to do that. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as obsolete per nom (I'm not sure it is technically redundant, but very close) —PC -XT + 22:15, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.