Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 August 26

August 26 edit

Template:TV Azteca Novelas edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:02, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TV Azteca Novelas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template unnecessary also seems to be a programming guide and wikipedia is not a programming guide. On the other hand; templates already exist: Template:TV Azteca telenovelas 2000s and Template:TV Azteca telenovelas 2010s Damián / talk 18:24, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

CNYearInTopicX templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:00, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:C14YearInTopicX (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:C15YearInTopicX (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:C16YearInTopicX (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:C17YearInTopicX (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:C18YearInTopicX (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:C19YearInTopicX (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Appear to have lain unused for some time. Sardanaphalus (talk) 15:30, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TCSR/doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by Tokyogirl79 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TCSR/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Inactive template used to manage WP:LISTCRUFT/WP:IINFO statistics that were once part of List of The Chase (UK game show) episodes. Template no longer in use following AFD for that article in 2013. AldezD (talk) 11:07, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:+3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was userfy, but feel free to take it to MFD if you still want it deleted. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:55, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:+3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Pointless and almost unused joke template that serves no legitimate Wikipedia purpose. If anyone really, really wants to do this, they can do it with {{+1|{{abbr|3|Me, myself and I}}}}. But as with the extant template, this is actually an abuse of <abbr>...</abbr> markup. While can can't prevent people from doing it, we can certainly get rid of a useless template that does it. Should be substituted in the handful of cases it's been used by anyone.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  06:01, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as this template does no harm, is only used on discussion pages, and improves moral and good will towards other editors. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 16:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete or userfy. Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete as it's a bit deceptive. If you want to do the whole "+ [number]" thing to indicate the number of supports, you'd hope that each added number reflected the actual number of supports. I get that the abbr text is supposed to address that, but I don't think it does so sufficiently. All that said, I'm mindful that appropriate use of this template should eliminate any concern (i.e., only using it in light-hearted conversations). —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 21:30, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.