Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 August 1

< July 31	August 2 >

August 1 edit

Template:List of Serbian companies by revenue edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:List of Serbian companies by revenue (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template used in just one article, text can be transcluded in the article Economy of Serbia The Banner talk 22:06, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Argument sort of valid, BUT.. that way template content is more prone to disruptive edits by some non-good faith unregistered users. This way I wanted to keep it on safe distance as it is harder for finding on wiki. Thinking of these editors who intentionally want to do disruptive editing.--AirWolf (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? What I do is suggesting to move the text to the mentioned article and then remove the then empty template. The Banner talk 22:55, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sort of to be done, try to mention deletion there: List of companies of Serbia. Template about to be deleted.--AirWolf (talk) 19:14, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tim Halperin edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per G7. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 07:06, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tim Halperin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough relevant links to warrant a navbox. Two albums and some "related articles", one's the record label he's on and another he's not even mentioned in. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 14:17, 1 August 2014 (UTC)}}[reply]

@Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: Feel free to delete - I had posted the template back before I understood the 5+ rule of thumb. Earflaps (talk) 17:27, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 19:47, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Allbritton edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:15, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Allbritton (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Sinclair Broadcast Group has completed its sale of Allbritton Communications. Allbritton Communications was a subsidiary of Perpetual Corporation, which Sinclair acquired. According to this article, Robert Allbritton's political publication Politico is owned by Capitol News Company, probably unrelated to Allbritton's TV properties. Since all the Allbritton stations articles are now using the Sinclair (SBGI) template, and while I was suggesting to rename the template as Capitol News Company or a similar name, I feel it wouldn't be wise to keep a template with only one link (Politico), and Allbritton Communications is now defunct. Csworldwide1 (talk) 08:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it appears it will be basically useless, now that its subject is defunct, and almost all of its links will be gone —PC -XT + 07:41, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.