Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 October 12

< October 11	October 13 >

October 12

Template:Hijak Oscar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:50, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hijak Oscar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox contains very few blue links (WP:NENAN), none of which appear to be notable. Gongshow ^Talk 15:35, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Gaelic games in county

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:49, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Gaelic games in county (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Senior ladies' football county teams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:49, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Senior ladies' football county teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

almost all red links. Frietjes (talk) 15:09, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MPS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:49, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MPS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and useless. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:17, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Main Page succeeded

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:49, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Main Page succeeded (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and useless. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:17, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TFA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:44, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TFA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Utility template which is only used on a couple of main page redesign proposals. Trivial to reconstruct if required in future. Can be substituted on the very few pages that transclude it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:16, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On second thoughts, while this is unused at present it's still a simple enough utility that it would be useful in future mockups. Happy to withdraw this. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:09, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if this is kept, it should be modified to allow entry of a date to select a featured article not from today. "TFA" could then mean "The Featured Article" (for date X) instead of "Today's Featured Article" -- 70.24.247.66 (talk) 11:11, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm hesitant to delete anything like this, I'd much rather just mark as historical if it's not being used. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:19, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cwb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cwb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused autodiscovery template which doesn't offer significant advantage over just manually specifying a book. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete, unused and no significant advantage of manual methods. Frietjes (talk) 19:10, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.