Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 June 24
June 24 edit
Template:My Lord series edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was userfy Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- Template:My Lord series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
WP:NENAN: Only 3 articles linked (and only 2 in the series). Izno (talk) 16:05, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- From my talk page. --Izno (talk) 14:27, 17 June 2012 (UTC). You marked the My Lord template for deletion because it only links to 2 games. The series actually has 4 iterations, and 3 have been translated (the third was translated as "No Heroes Allowed" http://blog.us.playstation.com/2010/09/02/no-heroes-allowed-announced-for-playstation-portable/). The issue is that the series does not have a consistent name in the west, in fact each iteration has had a different title. I've been meaning to write up articles for the third, and fourth games but just haven't gotten around to it. The series does deserve a template box though as I feel it has enough iterations to warrant one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damnedfan1234 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- Userfy based on the editor's comment. When these additional articles are created, Inzo can move this back to template space. Recommend that Inzo create an article about the series as a whole. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 15:10, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:41, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Izno, I don't understand what you mean by "damned". I looked thru this discussion and at the template itself and didn't see that word. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:43, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:User WikiProject Reality TV edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move to User:UBX/Reality television task force (per WP:GUS) Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:29, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Reality TV redirects to the Reality television task force. Since there is no WikiProject for this template, the template no longer is needed. -- JeffreyBillings (talk) 20:10, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Weak keep - With a change in the text to fix the link to the appropriate task force. It is far from being the most used user template I've ever seen, but other editors do have it on their pages and I think at least some of them might maybe be active in the topic. John Carter (talk) 20:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Perhaps we can move it to Template:User Reality television task force. -- JeffreyBillings (talk) 05:32, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:SK Austria Kärnten squad edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:36, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
There is no current squad. The club went bankrupt in June 2010. Kq-hit (talk) 11:50, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:00, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, template of defunct club - serves no purpose. GiantSnowman 20:29, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Image class edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete, as there are no objections, and it appears {{Hide if placeholder image}} addresses the problem. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Image class (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Image class names (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
With so few placeholder images in articles these days, doesn't seem a need to set a custom class name for them. WOSlinker (talk) 08:22, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.