Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 June 14

< June 13	June 15 >

June 14

Template:Office sequence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Office sequence start box (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Office sequence office (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Office sequence person (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

obsolete succession box template. Frietjes (talk) 23:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PrevUSH

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PrevUSH (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:55, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Siege category by conflict

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Siege category by conflict (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused cat header. Frietjes (talk) 23:47, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pronunc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pronunc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Singapore plm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Singapore plm (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused image insertion template. Frietjes (talk) 23:39, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rfmpage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rfmpage (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NYCS car

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NYCS car (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Proxyip3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Proxyip3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

appears to be unused, given the age (although it is possible it is substituted somewhere). Frietjes (talk) 23:30, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pelog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pelog (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

part of an inactive process, could substitute and delete. Frietjes (talk) 23:28, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cyclones of Chittagong Squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:08, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cyclones of Chittagong Squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

blanked and unused. Frietjes (talk) 22:15, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ottawa Lynx final roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:08, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ottawa Lynx final roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Team is defunct since 2007, we don't need this template. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:06, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Binga District

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete this one and any other empty ones. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Binga District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Bubi District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Buhera District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Chegutu District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Chikomba District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Chimanimani District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Chipinge District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Chiredzi District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Chirumhanzu District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Chivi District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Goromonzi District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Gutu District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Guruve District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template has no transclusions in article space. Dianna (talk) 04:12, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bindura District

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bindura District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one transclusion; pretty much devoid of content. Dianna (talk) 04:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Prerequisites sidebar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:13, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Prerequisites sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is redundant with the vastly more adaptable {{sidebar}}. This only has an option of 9 fields, which is rather limited. There are only two uses for this template, so it can be substed in. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 07:35, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete or substitute and delete. the limitation to 9 items was actually by design to try to keep folks from creating a sidebar which is too long. the fact that it uses plainlist means that it is in theory infinite as far as the number which could be supported (just pass the bulleted list to unnamed parameter 1). I think the strongest rationale for deleting it entirely is that it is only being used in a couple of articles, so there must not be a desire to used it more broadly. there probably isn't a strong desire to even used in the articles which are currently using it. Frietjes (talk) 00:06, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This uses {{sidebar}} internally now, so substitution should be totally uncontroversial. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 07:48, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Edens Edge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Edens Edge (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:TOOSOON, WP:NENAN. The band has one EP, one album and only one single with an article so far. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

indifferent, it does link 4 articles which is very close to the rule of 5. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:52, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Billings neighborhoods

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Billings neighborhoods (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one bluelink and no article space transclusions, doesn't navigate anything. WP:NENAN. Jenks24 (talk) 03:39, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:User Ot-chde

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was wrong venue, userboxes are discussed at MFD. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Ot-chde (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Probably not needed. Created a couple years ago and doesn't link to anything currently. Chances are if a user wanted something like this they would just recreate it because they wouldn't know it was here. Editor who created it hasn't edited in over a year. Kumioko (talk) 00:25, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:User Oklahoma City Barons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was wrong venue, userboxes are discussed at MFD. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:57, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Oklahoma City Barons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Probably not needed anymore. Doesn't link to anything and was created in January 2011. Kumioko (talk) 00:23, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:University of Baltimore Colleges and Schools

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:53, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:University of Baltimore Colleges and Schools (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Broken template not currently used on any articles. Its been around for a couple years so its probably uneeded. Kumioko (talk) 00:20, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete, although the "broken" aspect has been fixed (recent failed conversion to hlist) and the unused part has also been fixed (had been directly substituted in an article, rather than transcluded). Frietjes (talk) 15:44, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:University of Florida Broadcasting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:48, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:University of Florida Broadcasting (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Created in 2007 and doesn't appear to have ever been used. Does not currently link to any articles Kumioko (talk) 00:19, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete as redundant to Template:University of Florida and Template:Gainesville TV

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:University of Massachusetts Amherst Campus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:47, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:University of Massachusetts Amherst Campus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Created in April 2011 and doesn't appear to have ever been used. Doesn't currently link to anything Kumioko (talk) 00:18, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete as redundant to template:infobox university, which also covers colleges/campuses within universities. Frietjes (talk) 15:53, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:University of Arizona School of Information Resources and Library Science

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move to article space. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:University of Arizona School of Information Resources and Library Science (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Appears to be an incorrectly created article. Doesn't have the right layout for a template. Is Unused Kumioko (talk) 00:17, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy move to article space. Anyone who feels this shouldn't be an article can then take it to AfD.

The thing I'm not so sure of is whether to leave a redirect. In case the creator follows this link, we want that person to know that their article is still here to encourage further contributions. At the same time, this would be the epitome of the implausible redirect. I lean toward keeping a redirect but tagging it as not print worthy. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with that. I do notice one other troubling thing about this and that is, upon review of the references and the text, much of it is copy pasted from the sources. Kumioko (talk) 03:19, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

move to article space, tag as {{copyvio}} if there is indeed a problem, and possibly send to afd. no need to leave a redirect, since a link to the deleted page will tell where it was moved on the deleted page's log page. Frietjes (talk) 15:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.