Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 February 14

< February 13	February 15 >

February 14 edit

Indian football club navigational boxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:24, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aizawl F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Ar-Hima F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Bhawanipore F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Eagles F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Gauhati Town Club (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Green Valley F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Kalighat F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Kenkre F.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:KGF Academy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Quartz S.C. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Cart before the horse football team templates for an upcoming professional league that serve little to no navigational purpose at this time. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 22:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CWG, Inc. edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CWG, Inc. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

another orphaned, unused template which contains only redlinks mabdul 21:59, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, company has no article. TimBentley (talk) 23:29, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ELIANCE Enterprises edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ELIANCE Enterprises (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

another orphaned, unused template containing only redlinks mabdul 21:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. - Jorgath (talk) 21:59, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FIFTYNINTHStreet Media edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FIFTYNINTHStreet Media (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

orphaned, unused template with only redlinks... mabdul 21:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in that case. - Jorgath (talk) 21:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cybus Cybermen stories edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:06, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cybus Cybermen stories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Overkill, no good reason to have two separate templates for essentially the same fictional character. Ckatz^chat _spy 20:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question: So, what's the other template? HairyWombat 05:59, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, Template:Cybermen stories. --Ckatz^chat _spy 06:01, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete or redirect. Frietjes (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Yel-c6 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yel-c6 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Seemingly unused , Was this meant to be subst? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: My guess is that this series of templates was originally on one of the soccer rules articles, but that it got replaced with an in-article table because of guidelines. -Jorgath (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete LK (talk) 07:19, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Yel-c7 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yel-c7 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Seemingly unused, is this meant to subst? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:31, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: My guess is that this series of templates was originally on one of the soccer rules articles, but that it got replaced with an in-article table because of guidelines. - Jorgath (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Russian Tsar projects edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Russian Tsar projects (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The four articles linked by this template have absolutely and utterly nothing to do with each other except that they have "Tsar" in their name, are large, and are Russian. Here, lumped together, we have a 16th century cannon, an 18th century bell, a WWI tank design, and an atomic bomb.

This template was nominated for deletion back in 2005, and kept after consensus couldn't be reached to delete it. The main argument for keeping it was essentially "well, they're all large and Russian." I don't think this is enough of a connection to warrant a template.

The article Tsar bomba includes this sentence in the lead: The term "Tsar Bomba" was coined in an analogy with two other massive Russian objects: the Tsar Kolokol (Tsar Bell), the world's largest bell, and the Tsar Pushka (Tsar Cannon), the world's largest cannon. Wouldn't a sentence to that effect in each article be enough? Lithoderm 07:31, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Can anyone tell us if there IS a link between these two other than that mentioned in the nom? For instance, were they all created by Tsars? Is the term "Tsar project" meaningful? If not, Delete, if there is a connection, then I'll withhold opinion until I can evaluate the link's notability. -Jorgath (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- one of them is Soviet (Tsar Bomba), so it has nothing to do with Tsars. "Tsar" is a moniker that has been used for big or giant or grandiose. 65.92.182.149 (talk) 07:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Agreed. The articles may be notable; I don't care. The template establishes a non-notable, non-verified link between the objects in question. Delete. - Jorgath (talk) 23:06, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete related only by a moniker, as one of them is a bell, it's not even a superweapons list. 65.92.182.149 (talk) 07:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Interesting, though, that all have been given the moniker "Tsar". What if the articles don't carry a lead sentence along the lines of the above? Maybe keep with "Tsar" given in quotemarks? 213.246.121.83 (talk) 01:26, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Interesting" isn't a rationale for lumping things together into a template. If the articles don't have a sentence to that effect, it can be added. Lithoderm 21:33, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll even agree that the similarity of the names is interesting, but it seems to be simply a moniker that Russians attach to really big things, the way Americans add "Presidential" to really extravagant things, whether or not they have anything to do with each other or with a President. Furthermore, each of these items seems notable. The problem is that there's no link between them other than etymology. That link might merit having its own list article, or a lead sentence in each item's article, or a "See also" in each article. But it doesn't merit having a specialized template. - Jorgath (talk) 22:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete after moving links to the see also section. Frietjes (talk) 20:23, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.