Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 September 1

September 1

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:16, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alpha Phi Alpha Founders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete as redundant. This template is limited, and cannot be expanded, as it is only used on seven bio pages and at the bottom of the main Alpha Phi article. Those seven bios are wikilinked in the founding section of the Alpha Phi article and also have their own category, Category:Alpha Phi Alpha founders. Therefore, they are already appropriately (and more cleanly) crosslinked without this template. MSJapan (talk) 15:30, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 198.102.153.2 (talk) 19:54, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:17, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alpha Phi Alpha General Presidents (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template should be deleted because it is really a single use template being used on biographical articles of certain Presidents of the Fraternity (but only 5 have articles). This would make a lot more sense as a list in the Alpha Phi Alpha article (where it does not currently exist ad should as a matter of course), and perhaps more so because it is drawn from only one source. MSJapan (talk) 19:10, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 198.102.153.2 (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:27, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Samira Said (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template about the songs and albums of an artist (all red links) is used in only one article Tachfin (talk) 11:34, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. It's not much use having a navbox when all the links that matter are red. It can come back when someone writes articles about Said's albums and singles, assuming they are notable. Ucucha (talk) 15:29, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:27, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current events highlights (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, doesn't appear to be necessary. The Evil IP address (talk) 10:33, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was userfy Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:10, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Support the Troops ribbon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used by one user, doesn't warrant a template. The Evil IP address (talk) 10:24, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Curious that an international template doesn't mention which troops. Delete. Wikipedia is not a soapbox or battleground. Lightmouse (talk) 16:58, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see. This has absolutely nothing to do with WP policies but non-patriotic activism. Got it.JaMikePA (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:29, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ImageWarning (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We still don't censor images, even though some people would like to see that coming. The Evil IP address (talk) 10:22, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:30, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Western Kentucky Hilltoppers football roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unedited (save for a color change) since 2010. EmanWilm (talk) 01:35, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.