Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 March 14

< March 13	March 15 >

March 14 edit

Template:Ogden Publications edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:20, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ogden Publications (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates three articles, which can be accomplished with a see also section. If there were five or more, this might be a different story. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:46, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there are not enough (only 3) links to justify a navbox. —Air plane man— 00:53, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kings XI Punjab Roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objection to deletion. RL0919 (talk) 18:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kings XI Punjab Roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template that was used in only a single article. The only use been subst-ed. Peripitus (Talk) 21:07, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tlxw edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Redirect to {{Tlx}}, which has compatible functionality. RL0919 (talk) 14:39, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tlxw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Was once imported from Commons (where it was imported from Meta), where it had the purpose to link a template on Wikipedia. While the usefulness of such a tempate at these projects is already very questionable, it's simply unnecessary here at Wikipedia to have such a template. Just use {{Tl}} or {{Tlx}} and that's it. There are a few remaining uses, but they can easily be removed. (FYI, the two copies of this template at Commons and Meta got deleted there.) The Evil IP address (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment why not just redirect it to one of the two Wikipedia originals? 70.29.210.242 (talk) 04:07, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MusicPortal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objections to deletion. No prejudice against renaming of {{WikiPortal Music}}, which can be discussed on the talk page for that template or at Portal talk:Music. RL0919 (talk) 14:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MusicPortal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant to {{WikiPortal Music}}. Svick (talk) 12:38, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Both should probably become "Music Portal" or "Portal|Music"; Isn't there a standard somewhere? I know of nothing else using "WikiPortal"... -- Mjquinn_id (talk) 20:37, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mahayana Buddhism Portal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objections to deletion. RL0919 (talk) 14:16, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mahayana Buddhism Portal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and non-functional in its current form. Svick (talk) 12:23, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiPortal Literature edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Redundant and no objections to deletion. RL0919 (talk) 14:14, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiPortal Literature (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant to {{portal|Literature}} and {{Literature Portal}}. Svick (talk) 12:19, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Commons conflict edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:26, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Commons conflict (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This was once used by BetacommandBot, which is however now blocked indefinitely. The category Images with another image under the same name on Wikimedia Commons only contains two images left, which are both nominated for deletion. The template is furthermore redundant to {{ShadowsCommons}}, which is probably the better name, because this name is also used by other Wikipedias. The Evil IP address (talk) 12:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it does not appear to be redundant with ShadowCommons, since this is a Transwiki-processing template, and the other is a dupe template. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 04:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope, it's not a dupe template. ShadowsCommons is to be used when there's a different image under the same name, exactly like the template that I proposed here. It's solely different wording. --The Evil IP address (talk) 13:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete after the category is cleared. —Air plane man— 00:52, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Portal3 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 10:26, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Portal3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Virtually unused and redundant to {{portal box}}. Svick (talk) 00:54, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

REdirect to {{portalbox}} and fix all transclusions. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 06:41, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Economy of the Dominican Republic table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and no objections to deletion. RL0919 (talk) 14:10, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Economy of the Dominican Republic table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I think there is no reason to keep this template. It is included only in non-article pages (see), and the main article Economy of the Dominican Republic uses more common template {{Infobox economy}} instead of this one. RoadTrain (talk) 00:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.