Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 October 6

October 6 edit

Template:2008 F3 Euroseries edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:05, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2008 F3 Euroseries (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless. Duplication of main article. Cybervoron (talk) 14:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - How do you mean, "useless"? I think this template is one of many quite similar templates useful in connecting all articles related to a certain topic. --Intelligentsium 01:38, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This template duplicates the main article, which essentially is a set of links to related articles. And I don't think that this template helps the reader, but only confuses him. Cybervoron (talk) 14:43, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yearly templates like this are unnecessary - see Template:F3 Euroseries teams. The pages linked do not include the template because it is out of date. Could just redirect to Template:F3 Euroseries teams like Template:F3 Euroseries 2009. Same with the British F3 one below. - mspete93 [talk] 17:16, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, yes, I see. Redirect then. Intelligentsiumreview 23:45, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:British F3 2008 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:38, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:British F3 2008 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless. Duplication of main article. Cybervoron (talk) 14:42, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - How do you mean, "useless"? I think this template is one of many quite similar templates useful in connecting all articles related to a certain topic. Intelligentsium 01:41, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox toy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:05, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox toy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 16:50, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This was previously nominated in April and kept because it was supposedly going to be updated for use by WikiProject Toys. I see no evidence of any effort to follow through on that. I put a TfD notice on the project's talk page in case someone there really does want to do something with this. But absent convincing evidence that this is going to be used, my !vote is to delete this as unused and abandoned. --RL0919 (talk) 17:11, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I came across this template because I wanted to add it to the Nerf page; however, it's not useful. momoricks 21:54, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.