Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 October 14

October 14

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:20, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alexandra Burke (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Too small a template. Only links to four possible articles, nothing much. Deleted before the second single. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 23:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 15:46, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tfdend2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template was once useful to create links to pre-January 2006 TFD discussions. However, as it was only being used on about 12 articles, I have replaced all uses with {{tfdend}} with the "link=" option to generate the appropriate links. It now is unused and redundant to {{tfdend}}. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:33, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.