The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I've overhauled the design of the Brazilian portal using the random portal component, it has 20 selected articles, 17 selected pictures, 16 sets of 3 DYKs (48 in total), 20 selected biographies, in the news component, 17 selected quotes, and 10 panaromas along with categories, related wikiprojects, quality content, things you can do, topics, related portals and associated wikimedia sections. I would like some comments on how to bring this portal to featured status. Thanks. Sunderland06 (talk) 16:19, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- This is my first time at portal peer review, so forgive me if my review is useless, but here goes:
- Featured portal criteria checklist:
- It is:
- a) Useful - Yes, this is definitely useful for somebody attempting to find their way around Brazil-related content. All the articles it features are at B-class or higher.
- b) Attractive - On my screen the yellow is really bright, and the white text is hard to read on top of it.
- I've changed the gold to green of the Brazil flag which makes it clearer, also the white font goes much better with it. - c) Ergonomic - Overall, yes, but I suggest adding purge links to every randomised segment.
- d) Well-maintained - It is, but make sure it stays that way - update it regularly!
- a) Useful - Yes, this is definitely useful for somebody attempting to find their way around Brazil-related content. All the articles it features are at B-class or higher.
- It adheres to the standards in the Manual of Style and the relevant WikiProject guidelines; this includes conventions on naming, spelling, and style (see Portal and Portal guidelines).
- It has images where appropriate, with concise captions, linked credits, and acceptable copyright status (see Wikipedia:Non-free content).
- It is not self-referential: it does not speak of itself beyond (if at all) a welcome note. Aspects of portals that encourage contribution may be self-referential.
- It should include links to other Wikimedia Foundation projects when applicable. For all portals which have their central focus subject as a specific group of lifeforms, excluding humans, there should be a link to the Wikispecies project.
- To summarise: Change either the header bar or header text colours and add more purge links. Dendodge TalkContribs 21:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers for the review Dendodge, I'll have a look at the colour when I get time. Sunderland06 (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comments by Jh12
- This portal is looking really great! This is just a suggestion, but have you thought about having links for the subpages on the archive page? I believe everything to do that is already in place. For example, see Portal:Criminal_justice/Selected_article. I think it makes it easier to edit the entry you're looking for. At Portal:Schools/Selected article, I added extra links as well for future use. - Done - I've done that for all the different sections, article, biography etc.
- It doesn't have to be exact, but another suggestion would be to standardize entries to a range of lengths. Under Portal:Brazil/Selected_article/Archives on my screen, Amazon River has 6 lines of text while Portuguese Empire has more than 11 . Done - I think the length are at a decent length, although not all are perfect, they're pretty close.
- Finally, I standardized Portal:Brazil/Intro to the intro for Portal:Peru. Please revert the change if you don't like it. The alignment of text was off for me, with the first paragraph at the bottom of the intro --Jh12 (talk) 21:20, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.