Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
I wish for this article to be peer reviewed because I would like to one day nominate it for good article status. I would also appreciate any general comments on improvements that could be made. Thank you. Sean Stephens (talk) 11:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Comments from Tom (LT)
editHi Sean Stephens. Thanks for your edits to Wikipedia.
As you might know, GAs are reviewed against six criteria (WP:GACR). I think this article is well on its way. The areas I see being a problem is "lead". The article has great sources, an appropriate image and what text is there is well written. However the lead is very short, so it doesn't summarise the body, and this would need to be improved.
The second thing is (in my opinion), that the text within the article is quite short. My impression is that some additional information could be included to flesh it out a bit. If the album is notable enough to get an encyclopedia entry here, my feeling is that some of the very short sections such as "Release and promotion", "Recording and composition" and "Background" could be expanded.
Luckily, there are lots of good articles to model yours on. Have a look at WP:GA and find some good articles about music albums and you'll have a better idea where to aim.
Good luck! Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:45, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hey Tom (LT)! This is all very very useful feedback, I'm very grateful you took the time to write such a detailed response. I will definitely take your suggestions/advice on board; I tend to agree that certain sections of this article are quite short, I will try to expand them where possible. Sean Stephens (talk)