 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
Requesting this peer review to seek input from readers external to WP:VG on the standard of writing in the article. Whilst I will continue to work on copyediting and concision, it would be great to seek other perspectives on how this article could be improved. I am looking to develop this article to an FA standard which is a new process for me. Thanks! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 03:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- STANDARD NOTE: I have added this PR to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that template. Thanks! — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 06:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
@Vrxces: This has been open for over two months without comments. Are you still looking for feedback, or can this be closed and the article nominated to FAC? Z1720 (talk) 17:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed - I think I'm comfortable with proceeding to FAC. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 21:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)