Wikipedia:Peer review/SpongeBob SquarePants/archive2

SpongeBob SquarePants

Previous peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
Please look at this article and give any feedback that you may have in order to bring it to featured article status. -AMK152^{(Talk • Contributions • Send message)} 00:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Comments from Ealdgyth (talk · contribs)

• The article is almost completely unreferenced, needs many many many more references before it'll be close to FA status.
• The formatting on the references that are there is inconsistent, and website references are lacking publisher and/or last access dates, which are needed for WP:V
• You tube videos aren't reliable sources
• Several other of the sources given are of uncertain reliablity:
  • http://www.diet-blog.com/archives/2007/10/05/mcdonalds_fresh_salads.php
  • http://npower2.memorexelectronics.com/html/product_family.php?FID=8&SID=2&opento=2
  • http://www.news.toonzone.net/article.php?ID=22274
• Some sites deadlinked
  • http://www.viacom.com/view_release.jhtml;jsessionid=OQP0BQE5ORHWSCQBAFLQ4CY?inID=10000007&inReleaseID=227116
  • http://www.segaarcade.com/pr/SpongeBob.asp
  • http://www.zap2it.com/tv/news/zap-mightybamypoehlerSpongeBob’sixthseason,0,6061089.story?coll=zap-news-headlines
• "SpongeBob Exposed" is a book, but is lacking all other bibliographic information

You said you were wanting FAC soon, and I just looked at sources like I would have at FAC. I did not look over the prose. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

• A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 01:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)