Wikipedia:Peer review/PFA Players' Player of the Year/archive1

PFA Players' Player of the Year edit

This peer review discussion has been closed.
Another potential FL nomination, please let me know if there's anything I still need to work on. One major question - do you think the article needs to be re-named to "List of PFA Players' Player of the Year winners" or some such? For info, there's pretty much no details available in reliable sources on other aspects of the subject such as how it came to be instigated, the trophy itself, the voting procedure, or anything like that. Anyway, I eagerly await your comments...... ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) edit

  • Consider linking union?
  • Why are clubs centrally aligned in the table?
  • "place each spring" is it me or does that sound a little American? I'd say takes place every spring... personal opinion though..
  • "and the winner of the award, along with the winners of the PFA's other awards, announced at " is announced?
  • What does FWA stand for? Expand it on its first use.
  • Oh, and while you're there, put (PFA) after your first mention of the expanded version.
  • Flags don't appear to sort properly for me. I've fixed the problem...
  • Presumably the award was a First Division award before the Premier League existed? Could you clarify that?
  • Force column widths in the breakdowns to be the same for all tables.
  • The non-cite web references need full stops.

But otherwise it's FL quality. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    • Thanks for your comments, I've addressed most and will sort the rest tomorrow. On the "top division" thing, one thing I haven't found is whether the players are actually requested to specifically vote for the best player in the top division, or whether they could in theory vote for League Two players but just choose not to.... ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

  • I think the title should remain as it is, because as you say there is little info available to make a decent article on the subject, and many ice hockey awards are featured lists, and so is European Golden Shoe which is similar. NapHit (talk) 17:30, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]