Nuclear weapon edit
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to get a barnstar submit this article for a GA review and make it into GA. Eventually I would like for this article to become FA again! I would welcome any advice and feedback.
Thanks, Cheers, FriyMan talk 18:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Well, there are a lot easier ways to get a barnstar and to get an article to GA. I'll submit a full review soon. In the meantime, the first step would be to get it up to B class. That means that it has to pass criterion B1, which means that everything has to have an inline reference. There are already some "citation required" tags, but there are whole unreferenced sections. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- The second major problem is the "See Also" section. It's too large. Basically, it is telling you that the article does not cover the subject.
- Replace the first one with a {{Wikibooks}} template and put it in the external links section with the other Inter-Wiki links.
- Remove the portal; portals are in a bar down the bottom.
- Then remove all the links that are in the article. Each of the headings should be present as sections in the article (with a {{Main article}} template) The sub-topics should be mentioned in those sections. Start by eliminating the ones that already are in the article, and then add the ones that are not. You should be left with just a few, starting with the Timeline (although we can use a {{See Also}} card in the history section for that). There's some like the Butter Battle Book that should not be there at all. With any luck, the whole section will disappear. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2017 (UTC)