Wikipedia:Peer review/List of House episodes/archive2

List of House episodes edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to get it to Featured List. I've reviewed the past failed FLC nominations and the past peer review, and it looks like most of the issues listed there have since been addressed. Note that this hasn't had an FLC or peer review for 18 months now, so not only has House changed since then, but so has Wikipedia.

Thanks, Jclemens (talk) 02:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Ealdgyth (talk · contribs)

You said you wanted to know what to work on before taking to FLC, so I looked at the sourcing and referencing with that in mind. I reviewed the article's sources as I would at FAC. (Bear in mind that FAC and FLC might have differing requirements about where to put citations, but the reliability of sourcing should stay the same between the two processes.)
- Current refs 6, 7, and 9 you need to put the publishers of the site outside the link title. And they need last access dates.
- What makes the following reliable sources?
  - http://www.tvjab.com/fox-2008-2009-schedule-revealed/
  - http://spoilertv-house.blogspot.com/2008/09/episode-505-lucky-thirteen.html

Hope this helps. Please note that I don't watchlist Peer Reviews I've done. If you have a question about something, you'll have to drop a note on my talk page to get my attention. (My watchlist is already WAY too long, adding peer reviews would make things much worse.) 13:12, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Tv.com is not a reliable source, I'm sorry.
The lead is to short, per WP:LEAD. Maybe you should check this list or this list for inspiration.
Although it's not required, it would look better if you place a little bit of information above every season (see this list).

I'll try to help you this week if I find some spare time, I hope my comments have been usefull. --Music26/11 15:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've increased the lead a bit, added an image and added (and deleted) some references. The list might need a bit more referencing, but it's much better. As I said before, a little bit of information would look better if you list it for FLC.--Music26/11 15:33, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've replaced the TVJab reference with a Washington Post link. Hope that's sufficiently reliable. :-).
I'll be happy to add more references. Should individual episode reviews be linked here, or in the articles in question? See my recent edit to Dying Changes Everything for an example. Jclemens (talk) 17:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice referencing, I think induvidual episode reviews should be included in the article in question.--Music26/11 15:03, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]