Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Final Fantasy compilation albums/archive1

List of Final Fantasy compilation albums edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I'm trying to push List of Final Fantasy compilation albums to FL, and as I've never done that before, I'm looking for some feedback first. I created this article myself, by merging in around 10 stubby articles on individual albums, adding other albums without pages, and cleaning up/expanding/referencing the lot, all by myself. Some outside eyes would be good at this stage. --PresN (talk) 14:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: After a quick glance, I'd suggest finding some external links to add; like Square Enix's website or maybe Uematsu's since he probably composed most of the music. Maybe add a see also section for List of Final Fantasy media. I'm not sure about this, but you may encounter some problems with the number of images. Other than remove some, I don't know what to do about that. Hope this helps some. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 15:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Done and done, I'm hoping no one has a problem with the images since there's one per album, and only in the infobox. --PresN (talk)

I think there will be. There are some guidelines outlined at WP:ALBUM#Discography and mirrored at WP:NFC#Images 2, but good luck with that. An admin removed all the images from a soundtrack list I had been working on just earlier this month.--十八 06:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it happens, it happens, but I'll try to fight for it. There's not reason why the images aren't fine- if one image is fine in an infobox about one cd, then 3 images should be fine for 3 infoboxes about 3 cds, and 12 should be fine for 12 boxes about 12 cds. If I started doing limited edition covers or other images I could see it, but I'm not for just that reason. Any other concerns? --PresN (talk) 00:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 01:28, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The reception content should not always include "with" in the first sentence. Try changing some of these sentences for better flow. The Prince (talk) 23:57, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --PresN (talk) 02:23, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think the titles shouldn't be written in all caps (POTION, etc.). Kariteh (talk) 07:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --PresN (talk) 16:09, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]