Wikipedia:Peer review/Keri Hilson discography/archive1

Keri Hilson discography edit

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to nominate it for FL. But firstly, I would like some feedback on the article for any improvements.

Thanks, Oz talk 00:38, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments
  • "singer-songwriter Keri Hilson, consists of " no need for the comma. Done
  • "with T.I.." try to avoid the double full stop. Done
  • "number 11 on the US Billboard 200 chart, and number seven " 11->eleven (allowed by MOS and preferable not to mix the formats in a single sentence). Done
  • Where is "Make Love" referenced? – Which section are you talking about? Oz talk 13:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • In the "As lead artist" section. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:36, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • Theres a link to the song article. Oz talk 13:49, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        • Its existence should be referenced here, not by virtue of the fact there's an article (quality of which is unknown). The Rambling Man (talk) 13:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
          • Done
  • Same question for "She Don't Wanna Man" – Do you mean the Featured singles table? Oz talk 13:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Joseph Khan -> Kahn. Done
  • Laurie Ann Gibson -> Laurieann Done

Otherwise this will make a very suitable candidate at WP:FLC. Well done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:03, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quick comments from Michael Jester
  • How come the Soundtrack appearances, guest appearances, and music video tables do not have ! scope="row" |? I think that's a part of WP:ACCESS. Fixed
  • For the bottom of the tables (Idk if there's a specific word for it or not), I'm pretty sure there should there not be a comma before "or". Done
  • How come you have multiple references in the table columns for some (Example US R&B peaks for lead artist singles) and some have only one?
    • Because not all chart peaks are mentioned in one reference for those columns with multiple references. Oz talk 03:26, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • So why can't you do something like ref #2, #15, #27? Done
  • I see under-linking in the reference section.
    • I'm sorry but I'm not familiar with the term "under-linking" lol. Which part? Oz talk 03:26, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • It may be called something else, I'm not sure. Anyway, in the references section, things should be wikilinked on every occasion (except when multiple citations are used in a single reference [e.g. #2, #15]).
        • We can't add repeated links per WP:OVERLINK. Oz talk 11:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
          • That's for the article itself, not the references. It makes sense because a reader wants to learn more about something, they have to look through many references just to find it. J Milburn explains it better when I nominated K-Ci & JoJo for FL.
            Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 16:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC) Done[reply]
  • Why is iMDB in the EL section? I thought that was for movies? Removed
  • Other than that, I think the article looks great.
    Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 01:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Brief comments from Nikkimaria
  • One dead link
  • In general, too many commas - for example, "Hilson co-wrote songs for artists such as, Mary J. Blige" doesn't need one
  • Be consistent in what is wikilinked when in footnotes. I see that the reviewer above recommended wikilinking on every occasion - you can if you wish, but if so, it must be every time (except for the exception mentioned above). Nikkimaria (talk) 19:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]