Wikipedia:Peer review/Ethereum/archive1

Ethereum edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because Ethereum is a growing topic and I think we should check on the Wiki page and clear things up every once in a while. We're moving really quickly on the page, some edit wars are happening, and we really need a review to reset ourselves.

Thanks, Legionof7 (talk) 04:13, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The sourcing has improved tremendously in recent weeks. Well done! To reiterate what I've said on the talk page about the sourcing:
- The section that consists entirely of primary sources needs either verifiable third-party RSes or to be deleted until it can be recreated with good sourcing.

- Every marked primary source needs a verifiable third party RS.

- The claims that are marked as failing verification need verifiable third party RSes.

So basically you need more verifiable third-party RSes.

- David Gerard (talk) 12:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]