Wikipedia:Peer review/Backlash (2004)/archive1

Backlash (2004) edit

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… I would like for the article to be a professional wrestling Good Article. Any helpful feedback, would most be appreciated.

Thanks, Zenlax T C S 19:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 03:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) edit

Hello Zenlax, some comments which you may find useful.

  • Is it Backlash (2004) or Backlash 2004? Infobox has latter, title and lead has former. Or Backlash, as in the main article?
    • We do this because of the comments left on No Way Out (2004)'s last FAC. –LAX 19:13, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Not a good answer. Can you explain why you do this beside saying that it was because someone suggested it? What is the title? The Rambling Man (talk) 19:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • I changed the infobox to match the article title and lead. Sometimes it takes less effort to just change something in an article than to go about defending it. Nikki311 19:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • First three paras of Event could be merged.
  • "enziguiri kick" what's that?
  • You use [29][30] for five consecutive sentences. It'd be better to just use it once at the end of the fifth sentence. There are several examples of this.
done Zenlax T C S 20:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Numbers in parentheses indicate the length of the match." why in small font?
    • We do this because of the comments left on No Way Out (2004)'s last FAC. –LAX 19:13, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Well don't. What's the point? Small fonts just make it difficult for those with visualisation problems. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • Would you like this to be changed? Zenlax T C S 20:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
          • No longer small. Once again, not a big deal to change. Nikki311 19:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why is " Running Enzuigiri" capitalised?
    • The results stated here have it capitalized. I, however have removed "Running" from the finisher and left it with an Enzuigiri. Zenlax T C S 20:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • This may sound blunt but I don't really care what other articles have these problems, I want to know why nouns which aren't proper nouns are capitalised? If there's a reason then fine, otherwise it's just incorrect. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:02, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise I think it'd stand a very good shot at WP:GAN. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]