Wikipedia:Peer review/Al Pollard/archive1

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to bring it to FA. It may be a bit short, but there was not a great deal of material on him.

Thanks, ~EDDY (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 00:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Comments from Jappalang

Lede

Early life and high school

Loyola

Army

National Football League

Western Interprovincial Football Union

References

Image

  • File:Al Pollard 1951.jpg
    The project allows non-free image to identify a dead subject if no free replacements are available. That said, I doubt this image, though it might qualify for use as a non-free content, is of use. You cannot see the features of the subject at all. Furthermore "Al Pollard Makes Pro Debut, Los Angeles Times" is quite insufficient as a source. Please provide the exact date of edition and page number if possible. Why not use this football card instead?
    I added the football card, but I was told they were heavily copyrighted and it was unwise to use them. I updated the source information. ~EDDY (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 18:19, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am worried during my read of this article; the achievements of the player do not match the glowing appraisals (often from newspaper tidbits). This creates a discordant effect since each section is punctuated by those glowing statements, only to read the facts that his performance was dismal, leading to his less than stellar pick order, pay and tenure of play.

If the target is FA, then I would find the article lacking for the subject's personal ideology. Not knowing his thoughts and personality, I would not know the man and thus this article in my view, fails the comprehensive standard asked for at FAC. Jappalang (talk) 02:36, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]