Wikipedia:Peer review/1919 Copa del Rey Final/archive1

1919 Copa del Rey Final edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I plan on nominating it for an FA at some point in the future.

Thanks, — Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Non nobis solum. 14:12, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harrias edit

Some broad strokes points:

The citations need to specify more clearly what the source is. For example, reference 18 is currently:
- "El Día (Madrid. 1916). 19/5/1919". Hemeroteca Digital. Biblioteca Nacional de España. 19 May 1919. p. 5. Archived from the original on 20 September 2022. Retrieved 6 September 2022.
But this doesn't really tell us that usefully what the source is. So instead, I would recommend this (there is no need for an access date for a newspaper source:
- Martin Fernandez, A. (19 May 1919). "El "Arenas Club", de Bilbao, Campeon de España" [The "Arenas Club", from Bilbao, Champions of Spain]. El Día (in Spanish). Madrid. p. 5. Archived from the original on 20 September 2022 – via Hemeroteca Digital, Biblioteca Nacional de España.

All facts need citations to back them up. So, for example, the first paragraph of the Route to the final would need citations for the information provided.
I also can't see a source for the line-ups.
Opinions like those given in the first sentence of the match Summary "Barcelona used a more patient, technical style of play while Arenas relied on a brute-force method of reaching the opponent's goal. The latter's physical advantage and consequent endurance was a major influence on the result" need to have inline attribution. This can be as simple as: "According to Martin Fernandez, Barcelona used a more patient, technical.."
A bit of further context would be useful. How successful were the teams in the subsequent years? When was La Liga formed, and were the teams part of that?

The prose would also need some tidying prior to a FAC, but finer detail like that can be worked on after getting the structure right, I think. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 18:03, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll work on the citations soon, thanks so much for the comments and sorry for replying so late, Harrias. I'm uncertain about where to provide that further context. A section after the Match section could work but I don't know what it would be titled. — Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Non nobis solum. 10:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Standard note edit

I have added this PR to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that template. Thanks! Z1720 (talk) 01:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ixtal: It has been over a month since the last comment. Are you still interested in receiving comments? Z1720 (talk) 03:35, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720, not anymore, I'll work based on the comments I've received. — Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Non nobis solum. 21:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]