Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Nathan Drake (Uncharted)/1

Nathan Drake (Uncharted) edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • (Uncharted)/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delist. Unfortunately, there are no interested editors and they seems to be edit warring only at the infobox. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 12:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to be mostly clean up, rewritten and updated a little bit (implementing new sources). Concept and design along has 2 quotes that made the section even more messy. The major concern is the receotion section where it mostly needed to be rewritten and trim something like, removing listicles that aren't necessary or rewrite it instead of "Nathan Drake was ranked as X" and if multiple sources that amount the same thing should be maybe written like (Magazines have described Nathn Drake as one of the best video game character.[1][2][3] and etc.) + some of the new sources should be implemented to fulfill its GA criteria. Rewriting it probably needs a lot of work. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 10:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you raise these issues on the talk page before nominating? - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 18:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, but this GAR could stay as long as someone is interested working on it. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 21:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's important to first inform recent, frequent editors of the article that you think it falls below GA standards and give them the chance to clean it up before bring it to GAR. GAR can make one feel overwhelmed and as though they're facing a deadline. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 00:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, GAR could wait, just like what happen to Samus Aran. Thou, I think your preferences seems reasonable anyway. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 00:07, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree with Gherkin that time should be given to notify and improve if not improving the situation yourself before rushing straight to GAR, be careful not to start becoming disruptive with your nominations as they should be a last resort. GAR also has nothing to do with notability whatsoever. Drake is undoubtedly notable so there is no question there. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I will raise issues first before nominating GAR in other articles soon (of course we're not questioning about his notability). Thou, this GAR would be remained open if someone is interested enough at working on this article. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 22:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.