Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Heartbleed/1

Heartbleed edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted due to the verifiability concerns raised by Vanamonde93. Mz7 (talk) 10:45, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the four years since this article was listed as a GA, a number of verifiability problems have crept in, to the extent that the page no longer meets the Verifiability criterion for Good Articles. I'm listing this for community reassessment because although I noticed this page in skimming through some GAs, I have had unpleasant interactions with the editor who nominated this for GA status (who has since been indeffed for sockpuppetry). Vanamonde (talk) 06:09, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist if uncited statements are not fixed in a timely manner. buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 03:09, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist, per my statement above, and because the unsourced content is somewhat technical material; fixing it isn't a trivial undertaking. Vanamonde (talk) 06:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]