Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Dinosaur Ridge in 2019

Dinosaur Ridge in 2019 edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2019 at 18:41:13 (UTC)

Original – View of the Dinosaur Ridge at Seoraksan National Park at sunset.

Reason: This image appears to be one of the best images related to the Seoraksan National Park. It is currently the main image at Dinosaur Ridge (Gangwon), Seoraksan National Park, and Seoraksan.
Articles in which this image appears: Seoraksan, Seoraksan National Park, Dinosaur Ridge (Gangwon), Gangwon Province (South Korea)
FP category for this image: wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: Taewangkorea

I Withdraw my Nomination Taewangkorea (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2019 (UTC) * Support as nominator – Taewangkorea (talk) 18:41, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI there is a higher res version at File:Dinosaur Ridge in 2019.jpg Taewangkorea (talk) 19:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't we want the higher resolution to be featured? --- Coffeeandcrumbs 21:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Coffeeandcrumbs: This one is the original one and the higher res one was upscaled with GIMP. I dont' know clearly what the policy is when it comes to upscaled images so I put the original. Swapping it out would be pretty easy. Taewangkorea (talk) 22:01, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then you did the right thing nominating this one. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 22:02, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support – The article would have to be expanded before this gets on the Main Page. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 22:05, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I plan to expand the article for Seoraksan within the next few days and edit it significantly. Taewangkorea (talk) 22:13, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Clearly oversaturated. The colors are totally fake. The whole image is overprocessed. Very bad image to document the park: it doesn't look natural at all -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I agree with what Basile says, but also there are very visible compression artifacts in the grayer and more distant parts of the image. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:51, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile and David. Geoffroi 06:19, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Per previous. No dayglo, please. – Sca (talk) 12:44, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile and David. The blue-violet haze doesn't look good. - Marcos [Tupungato] (talk) 22:17, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:42, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]