Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Adele/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by Sephiroth BCR 22:47, 9 May 2009 [1].
- Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Adele/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Adele/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Another Believer, no wikiprojects. Feel free to disagree, but I think there is no point in notifying them since very little (if anything) can be done and they are already well aware of the criteria change. All it does is clog up their talk page with messages.
Per criterion 3b, I believe that this page can be considered a content fork and does not meet the requirements of standalone lists. The majority of these awards could easily be merged into her page. -- Scorpion0422 13:46, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Fails 3b and nothing can be done to bring it up to standard. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:21, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist and merge Reywas92Talk 15:21, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep/Comment: Just for the record, I can understand not awarding this list with a featured star, but I do not think the list should be deleted or merged to the Adele article. This is a quality, informative list that presents information in a clear, concise manner. Please consider leaving the article in tact, so that it can be updated in the future. Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 20:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is not a deletion or merging discussion. This is just decide whether or not the list should retain its featured status. -- Scorpion0422 20:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What Scorpion said. Additionally, quality does not determine whether an article can/should exist. I could write a really nice article about the sewer cover in front of my house, but would it last long on Wikipedia? Probably not. Extreme example, but the idea is the same. This information can be presented in the main article just as nicely, without the lead, which would be superfluous. Anyhow, the list fails 3b and should be delisted. What happens after that is not important here. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the clarification, Scorpion. I just wanted to make sure this wasn't a deletion or merging discussion--Reywas92's "Merge" comment threw me off. Again, I have no problem with removing the featured star, if it is not up to standard. I just like these awards/nominations lists, and I'd hate to see them disappear simply because they are not 'featured'. Thanks again! --Another Believer (Talk) 22:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What Scorpion said. Additionally, quality does not determine whether an article can/should exist. I could write a really nice article about the sewer cover in front of my house, but would it last long on Wikipedia? Probably not. Extreme example, but the idea is the same. This information can be presented in the main article just as nicely, without the lead, which would be superfluous. Anyhow, the list fails 3b and should be delisted. What happens after that is not important here. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is not a deletion or merging discussion. This is just decide whether or not the list should retain its featured status. -- Scorpion0422 20:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist and probably should be merged, per 3b criterion. (Note, i say it should be merged imo, but that should be determined on the talk page of the article after delisting here.).YobMod 14:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.