Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Paramore discography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 15:23, 3 April 2010 [1].
Paramore discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/Paramore discography/archive1
- Featured list candidates/Paramore discography/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I spent a couple of months working on it and, based on previous nominations, I thought this article is ready to be promoted to a FL. Sources, lead and images are fine in my opinion and the peer review I resquested before this nomination is already archived. Decodet (talk) 16:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Mm40 (talk) |
---|
*Quick comment: The arrows in the box to the right of the lead don't link to the correct section. Mm40 (talk) 19:13, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Mm40 (talk) 12:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good otherwise, I'll support once these issues are resolved. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 12:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
Support Mm40 (talk) 02:30, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Not sure I'm keen on the inclusion of information that you cite with "couldn't be cited with a RS"... interested to see what others have to say.
The Rambling Man (talk) 19:23, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Dabs; please check the disambiguation links identified in the toolbox. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.