Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/New Orleans Hornets draft history
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by User:The Rambling Man 07:21, 29 July 2008 [1].
All right, I think it's time to nominate this list now. All comments/suggestions/questions are welcome and will be dealt with.--Crzycheetah 00:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- Change the verb in "The New Orleans Hornets is an American" to plural.
- "same up the the present time" - Should the first "the" be changed to a "to"?
Reorion (talk) 03:05, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed, thanks for noticing those.--Crzycheetah 05:30, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments- Great list, I feel though that the Key doesn't need its own section, it should just be with the selections section.--SRX 17:52, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, Teams can also trade their picks, which means that in some drafts teams may have more or less than two draft picks, although they must have at least one first-round pick every other year. in this sentence, its a run on, either split it or place a comma after "drafts."--SRX 17:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, why isn't the NBPA wikilinked here? - In 1989, the NBA agreed with the National Basketball Players' Association to limit drafts to two rounds, an arrangement that has remained the same up to the present time.[3]--SRX 17:58, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the comments! NBPA is linked. I made some changes to that sentence, tell me how it reads. As for the Key section, if there were one or two abbrs., then I'd agree. Since there are 9 of them here, I believe a new section is needed.--Crzycheetah 22:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- "The New Orleans Hornets are an..." should be "The New Orleans Hornets is an..."
- "2005–07" should be "2005–2007" since 2005-07 confused me since it looks like a season.
- "The franchise..." should be "The Hornets" ot "The New Orleans Hornets" because it is in another paragraph.
- link "1989" to its NBA Draft.
- "an MVP" should be "a MVP".
- The rest of the third paragraph looks good (since I wrote most of it...jokes)
- In the thumb picture of Baron Davis, "Baron Davis has played in NBA All-Star Games..." should be "Baron Davis has played in (1 or 2. I don't know) NBA All-Star Game(s)..." You should also mention that he was drafted in 1999.
- If done all, I'll support.
Annoyomous24 21:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for commenting. Your ## 3,4,and 7 comments are fixed. The rest will be grammatically incorrect if changed. The New Orleans Hornets are not is, when talking about 2 or more years the last year should be shortened to the last two digits, except when we're talking about "1999-2000". An MVP is grammatically correct, as well. Cheers!--Crzycheetah 22:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- How is "an MVP" grammatically correct when MVP starts with a M? Annoyomous24 23:59, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Say it out loud! MVP! What's the first sound? Em-Vee-Pee! He is an Em-Vee-Pee!--Crzycheetah 01:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- How is "an MVP" grammatically correct when MVP starts with a M? Annoyomous24 23:59, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I dislike coloring the table heads. I see most of the draft FLs do that, but the Lakers one does not. Just a statement, not a vote; I would suggest going with a plain wikitable. --Golbez (talk) 12:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Coloring is removed.--Crzycheetah 18:59, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great job, Crzycheetah! Annoyomous24 20:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Great list. But I think the top of the table should use the team color for consistency to other FLs such as List of Houston Rockets first and second-round draft picks or Toronto Raptors draft history. If done, I will support.—Chris! ct 21:40, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Looks like I miss the comment above. If we go with a plain wikitable on this article, perhaps we should modify other draft history lists as well.—Chris! ct 21:42, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support —Chris! ct 21:43, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- "due to Hurricane Katrina" - well, strictly it was presumably down to the damage caused by the hurricane which meant they couldn't play there, or was it a franchise decision to ensure they had a decent crowd?
- "Jeff Moore" seems to be the only player without an article - does he fail WP:ATHLETE? If not then he should have an article.
- Ref 2 has publisher = USATODAY.com while ref 3 has work = USA Today -but they both point to the same website.
- Ref 1 has "p. 140 (70-78). " - what does the 70-78 refer to? Same for refs 8 to 11...
- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:16, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Katrina is explained and Jeff Moore is created. USATODAY.com actually published the work of Associated Press in the first instance while the second instance was their own work; I mentioned Associated Press. As for the pages, the first one is the page number of the media guide and in the parentheses the first number represents the page number of the PDF file where the info is and the second number represents the last page in the PDF file. Could you suggest a way to explain this better?--Crzycheetah 18:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.