Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of five-wicket hauls in Twenty20 International cricket/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by SchroCat 09:25, 14 April 2015 [1].
List of five-wicket hauls in Twenty20 International cricket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): —Vensatry (ping) 09:40, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A short list, but likely to grow in the coming years. I have another nomination open at the moment, which has got two supports and no outstanding concerns. Look forward to your comments and suggestions. —Vensatry (ping) 09:40, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- My only quibble is this half sentence: "The full members of the ICC including Australia, India, England and Zimbabwe are yet to have a player taking a five-wicket haul......". This doesn't make grammatical sense as it stands, better wording would be "Australia, India, England and Zimbabwe are the only full members of the ICC yet to have a player take a five-wicket haul....." -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:59, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed. Thanks for the comments —Vensatry (ping) 09:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 11:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 21:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support all my issues resolved, a good list. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Great and well-sourced list. --Carioca (talk) 22:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. – SchroCat (talk) 09:19, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.