Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Up/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 07:46, 15 September 2010 [1].

List of accolades received by Up

Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Up/archive1

Nominator(s): Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 05:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because although it is based on the IMDb list, I believe the article pass the FL criteria. It is well-sourced and, as far as I know, well-written. Thank you for your comments. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 05:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 09:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Dan Dassow (talk) 04:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*Comment-Check links found no problems. Summary paragraph is fine. The citations seem relevant. The summary and main table do not agree. The Blimp Award is shown in main table and Kids' Choice Awards (Blimper Award) is show the in summary table. Need to add Palm Dog Award to summary table (1 nomination, 1 win). Total nominations should be 63. Total wins should be 37. --Dan Dassow (talk) 10:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I forgot to update it, and it is fixed now. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 15:16, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Looks good. My concerns were addressed. --Dan Dassow (talk) 04:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The source for the "Annie Awards" does not lead to any information like the others. Its a blank page.--PeterGriffin • Talk 22:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. I hate when that happens. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 22:36, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks good now :).--PeterGriffin • Talk 03:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both for their comments :) Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 04:26, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 14:17, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Probably a good idea to link "Wilderness Explorer" to Boy scout or something appropriate.

Linked to Scouting in popular culture Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 01:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"$68,108,790 dollars and grossing $731,342,724" to the nearest dollar! Presumably this was on a precise date, so you need to quote it (Up was still running periodically at my local cinema up until a few weeks ago).

Shortened to over $731 million dolars. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 01:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"winning two of them" not sure you need "of them"

Removed Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 01:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"fully animated" hyphenate?

What do you mean? Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 01:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would definitely prefer nowrap on the date of each award.

I don't understand this, could you specify please? Tbhotch^Talk ^C.

Force the dates not to wrap onto two lines. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:30, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the on May 29, 2009, were doing that, so it is removed. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 16:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 3 has spare period (blame the template...)

Removed Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 01:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 20:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support Impressive work. On par with the best film award lists like that of Precious. I looked in the article for a long time, but its pretty flawless. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:21, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :D Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 06:44, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Much as I wanted to pick apart the prose, I couldn't find anything that needed picking apart. Very nice piece of work. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

lol, thanks Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 22:19, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Courcelles 04:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*Comments

Ref 10 has an author available.

Added Tbhotch^Talk ^C.

Ref 12 needs a work/publisher

Oops Tbhotch^Talk ^C.

"Pete Docter won the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature while he held his iPhone." This needs a retry. He's holding his phone in the photo, but he didn't win the Award while doing so!

An IP user added it, and I didn't noticed about the meaning, sorry Tbhotch^Talk ^C.

"It is the second fully animated film to be nominated for the Academy Award for Best Picture," It was, perhaps?

Changed Tbhotch^Talk ^C.

"Furthermore the film was nominated at the Satellite Awards 2009..." Furthermore the film was nominated at the 2009 Satellite Awards... Courcelles 04:32, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changed. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 04:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Should have looked at the history for vandalism when I saw that caption, it looked so strange. Glad that's sorted. Courcelles 04:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

that happens, thanks for your comments. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 04:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.