Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Star Wars: The Force Awakens/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 1 November 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of accolades received by Star Wars: The Force Awakens edit

Nominator(s): Chompy Ace 11:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars: The Force Awakens is an American film that received numerous accolades from various outlets. I nominated this list since I have reworked and expanded this list as its first nomination did not gain any support(s). Chompy Ace 11:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment edit

There's some oddities when sorting the recipients column. Andy Nelson sorts between Roger Guyett and Rick Hankins. April Webster sorts between Lessons and Name. Joshua Lee sorts between Daisy Ridley and Neal Scanlan.......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:49, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisTheDude

Fixed. Chompy Ace 00:24, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More comments edit

"The film have received" => "The film has received"
Star Wars: The Force Awakens – (John Boyega) - dash and brackets combo looks odd
Star Wars: The Force Awakens (LA) - what's LA in this context?
Think that's all I got - great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:34, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisTheDude all

Done. Chompy Ace 22:44, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Birdienest81

The only thing I would change is for websites whose Wikipedia pages are not italicized (BBC News, Box Office Mojo, GMA Network, The Numbers, etc.), move the citation field from "website" to "publisher". Otherwise, great work. Would you take a look at 94th Academy Awards, regarding its featured list nomination?

--Birdienest81talk 08:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Birdienest81 ~~per MOS:ITALICWEBCITE, "Do not abuse incorrect template parameters (e.g. by putting the work title in~~ Chompy Ace 21:25, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Birdienest81? Also, I cannot do it because that guideline linked to it would affect with {{Cite Box Office Mojo}} and/or {{Cite Rotten Tomatoes}}, since they automatically do themselves. It would be the case per List of accolades received by The Shape of Water. Chompy Ace 20:54, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Birdienest81:

Done except those website-specific citation templates (which conforms MOS:ITALICWEBCITE) per above comment. Chompy Ace 22:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support: I forgot about that Rotten Tomatoes and Box Office Mojo has its own template. So yes, those cannot be overridden. However, BBC News, GMA Network, The Numbers, etc. do not have their own template. So those should be placed under publisher or agency fields. Otherwise, good work.

--Birdienest81talk 07:28, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Harushiga

Great job as usual! My only comment is that you used an archived version of ref 13, which states that the film is the third highest-grossing of all time. However, looking at its latest version, it states that it's now the fourth highest-grossing. Harushiga (talk) 12:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harushiga: Its peak position is third at the end of its theatrical run so keep per diff at Avengers: Age of Ultron (Special:Diff/1113904715): "dated status, subject to change"; and the notes regarding such place for that article (which placed AoU at fifth eventually: "This is the PEAK POSITION the film achieved NOT the CURRENT. Please do NOT adjust!" The dead link is fine for me. Chompy Ace 13:07, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying, this is a support for me! Harushiga (talk) 13:39, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source review – The sources all appear to be sufficiently reliable and well-formatted, and no dead links were detected by the link-checker tool. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. --Pres N 13:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.