Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Frozen II/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of accolades received by Frozen II edit

List of accolades received by Frozen II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Chompy Ace 04:44, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this list since I expanded and improved this list at the parent article, and I created this page to 74 nominations and above 50k bytes. I appreciate that the parent article and its soundtrack respectively promoted to featured and good articles by Wingwatchers recently, so this list goes to featured status. Chompy Ace 04:44, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from ChrisTheDude edit

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:23, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
*"Made on a production budget of $150 million,[9] it earned $1.450 million worldwide" - think there's a typo in there, unless it was one of the biggest flops of all time......
  • The note looks a little strange IMO - why not just put the refs against the sentence(s) they source?
  • Think that's all I got, nice one! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All  Done; the first point is correct, since this is an overview of the film for the first two paragraphs in the lead. Chompy Ace 07:34, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Chompy Ace: if the first point is correct, then it earned back less than 1% of its budget? Wow, it really was the biggest flop of all time ;-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done again; the first point was addressed since I omitted the "Made on a production budget of $150 million,[9]" text at Special:Diff/1090949707. Chompy Ace 09:32, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Chompy Ace: - apologies, I am clearly not expressing myself very well. Feel free to put back in the bit about the budget, that wasn't a problem - the issue I was trying to highlight is that the article says the film "earned $1.450 million worldwide" i.e. less than two million dollars, which is clearly wrong. I presume it's meant to say $1.450 billion -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done! Fixed it! Considerably. Chompy Ace 10:21, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by RunningTiger123 edit

  • There are discrepancies between the infobox and list. The list shows 13 wins from 69 total nominations by my count, but the infobox total says 15 wins/74 nominations, and the full list in the infobox totals to 15 wins/72 nominations.
  • Rotten Tomatoes data should be updated (currently at 77% from 336 reviews)
  • "The film won one of six nominations at the 49th Annie Awards." – incorrect
  • "Various critic circles have also picked it as the best animated feature film of the year." – I couldn't find any critics' groups in the list that gave it an award for "Best Animated Film", so this statement is unsupported.
  • "Peter Del Vecho" should sort by "Del Vecho", not "Vecho"
  • It might be worth mentioning that it set the record for largest opening weekend for an animated film.

— RunningTiger123 (talk) 18:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RunningTiger123:  Done all but the sixth point since No consensus Guinness World Records (RSP entry) is recognized as "marginally reliable" at WP:RSP, so it will not count on the film's awards. Chompy Ace 22:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
RunningTiger123? Chompy Ace 07:06, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I missed the first ping, I don't know why I wasn't notified. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pamzeis edit

Hope I won't screw this up

  • The citations in the middle of sentence impair readability a bit; perhaps they could be moved to the end of sentences or after the nearest punctuation?
  • "also writing the screenplay and conceiving the story with Buck" — was she both writing the screenplay and conceiving the story with all these people or only conceiving the story?
  • "the film stars Kristen Bell" — to me, "stars" implies live-action; perhaps "stars the voices of"?

Hope this helps :) Pamzeis (talk) 10:07, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pamzeis:  Done all at Special:PermanentLink/1095358490 Chompy Ace 22:25, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pamzeis? As of Special:PermanentLink/1095616475, you take another look at it? I have clarified the second point based on List of accolades received by The Big Short (film) with a note for Lee. Chompy Ace 11:17, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • For some reason, I didn't get the first ping; imma go ahead and support this. Pamzeis (talk) 11:55, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Source review – The references are well-formatted throughout and the link-checker doesn't reveal any issues. Regarding reliability, I have one concern: what makes Next Best Picture (refs 31, 32, 52, 56, and 61) a reliable source? The site itself says that it is a blog, a category of website that normally isn't considered reliable enough for featured content purposes. I'd suggest finding replacements for these links. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:23, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Giants2008: same here at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Encanto (film)/archive2, in which this passes the source review, saying "
    No issues with the reliability of any sources—I had a look at the NextBestPicture and Cinema Daily US websites and journalists (previously unfamiliar to me) and am satisfied that each is reliable for the claim they are cited for." Chompy Ace 23:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Giants2008:  Done at Special:Diff/1096992788. Chompy Ace 00:45, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The references I commented on have been replaced/removed. With that, I'd say my source review has been passed. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. --PresN 00:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_accolades_received_by_Frozen_II/archive1&oldid=1098468881"