Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Texas Tech Red Raiders head baseball coaches/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 17:08, 2 May 2011 [1].
List of Texas Tech Red Raiders head baseball coaches (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): NorthTechsan (talk) 23:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because...
This list is based on both Major League Baseball, collegiate football, and collegiate basketball FLs. Even though this is my first FL nomination, I have gone over the FL criteria numerous times. NorthTechsan (talk) 23:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Concerns over criterion 3b, in other words, why couldn't this be merged back into the Texas Tech Red Raiders main article (which is in poor order but quite short)... ? The Rambling Man (talk) 18:10, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Everything including the prose after "Hays is the only head coach..." would be in question to be included into the main article Texas Tech Red Raiders baseball. That section, head coaches, would make up the majority of the article where as the head coaches section on Texas Tech Red Raiders baseball should have a summary instead. Perhaps the prose of this list needs to be expanded on to continue as a FLC here? NorthTechsan (talk) 21:50, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's just my opinion, and that's as a reviewer at this point. I just think you'll have problems with other reviewers who would expect this to be merged back into the main article. The main article is (in general terms) quite short and could easily accommodate this data (in my opinion). The Rambling Man (talk) 21:57, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If the main article, Texas Tech Red Raiders baseball, was more developed, do you think that would that help with 3b? NorthTechsan (talk) 22:02, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Well definitely. The main reason these content forks are created legitimately is because the main article is becoming too fat. There's a long way to go with the Texas Tech article though... The Rambling Man (talk) 22:04, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok well than I'll withdraw this nomination. NorthTechsan (talk) 22:32, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Well definitely. The main reason these content forks are created legitimately is because the main article is becoming too fat. There's a long way to go with the Texas Tech article though... The Rambling Man (talk) 22:04, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If the main article, Texas Tech Red Raiders baseball, was more developed, do you think that would that help with 3b? NorthTechsan (talk) 22:02, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's just my opinion, and that's as a reviewer at this point. I just think you'll have problems with other reviewers who would expect this to be merged back into the main article. The main article is (in general terms) quite short and could easily accommodate this data (in my opinion). The Rambling Man (talk) 21:57, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Everything including the prose after "Hays is the only head coach..." would be in question to be included into the main article Texas Tech Red Raiders baseball. That section, head coaches, would make up the majority of the article where as the head coaches section on Texas Tech Red Raiders baseball should have a summary instead. Perhaps the prose of this list needs to be expanded on to continue as a FLC here? NorthTechsan (talk) 21:50, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.