Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Pune Warriors India cricketers/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Hahc21 10:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Pune Warriors India cricketers

Featured list candidates/List of Pune Warriors India cricketers/archive1

Nominator(s): ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 07:39, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because it meets the criteria. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 07:39, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quick comments from Harrias ^talk

The dashes in batting average should sort at the bottom, at least for the cases when the player has not batted.

It is already like that.

Not in my browser. Harrias ^talk 22:04, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want them to sort at bottom while in ascending order or while in descending order? ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 10:28, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the best bowling average (40.07) should sort top, then down through the numbers to 0.00, and then the dashes. Harrias ^talk 10:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Done[reply]

The bowling average sorts completely wrong, the 6.00 and 9.00 sort as 60.00 and 90.00. Done
Why does batting average use emdashes, when the rest use endashes? Done Harrias ^talk 14:58, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from —Vensatry _{(Ping me)}

Comments from —Vensatry _{(Ping me)}

Alt text should name the subject per WP:ALT
"Sourav Ganguly had captained Pune Warriors India in highest number of matches" -> Sourav Ganguly had captained Pune Warriors India in the highest number of matches
The use of colon in "Ashok Dinda had the best bowling figures..." is wrong, rather semi colon should be used. Also in the last sentence of the first para colon is incorrectly used. There should be a pause between the figure and the following text.
It's better to place the last sentence just above the table (in italics)
You don't have descriptions for "ave", "Wkt" and "BBI" in the key.
You have "Centuries scored" listed in the key but not in the table, though none of the players scored a hundred.
In the table yo;ve linked "Bowling" and "Fielding" but not "Batting".
Why is ESPNcricinfo (in the publisher parameter) linked in ref #4 alone?
"See also" section should be placed above your notes and references.

—Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 18:58, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 12:25, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comments (re-visit)

Link publisher (CricketArchive)in ref #8
For Batting average, dashes should appear at the top while sorting by descending order
The IPL template is not needed here as it doesn't link here.

—Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 15:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 03:45, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Zia Khan 15:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments—on prose only,

The best bowling average among bowlers who had bowled more than 20 overs was Yuvraj Singh's: 22.93. No need of column (:).
Link bowling figures (bowling analysis).
...while only conceding 18 runs. No need of while only.
In the 1st and second Footnotes: This doesn't includes → include
inning/s → innings
Link not out in the Footnotes.
Period at the end of the third note.

Zia Khan 01:01, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 10:11, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support on prose. Zia Khan 15:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.