Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Hot Country Singles number ones of 1965/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 10 August 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Hot Country Singles number ones of 1965 edit

Featured list candidates/List of Hot Country Singles number ones of 1965/archive1

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:56, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A total of 48 lists of number-one country songs have now been successfully promoted to FL status, so here is what will hopefully be the 49th. In this particular year, a new record was set for the longest stay at number one by a female singer which would stand for close to 50 years....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:56, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from MEDUSA

Ref two brings an error
Billboard refs don't show website or publishers only retrieved
stood until 2012, when Taylor Swift's → I see no reasons to add a comma
|rowspan="5"|"[[King of the Road (song)|King Of The Road]]" → |rowspan="5"|"[[King of the Road (song)|King of the Road]]"

That's it from me. Nice work btw. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 16:30, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CAPTAIN MEDUSA: - all done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support — ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 20:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Bloom6132 (talk) 15:17, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments –

In light of the recent RFC on table captions (closed back in May) and how FLCs have to follow MOS:ACCESS, a table caption should be included. However, I think this quote by PresN applies to this list: "In the case that the table is the first thing in a section where the section header is essentially the same as what the caption would be, and therefore looks duplicative visually, you can make the caption screen reader-only with the {{sronly}} template, e.g. "|+ {{sronly|Example table caption}}" instead of "
Read the prose in detail – looks all good.
Images utilized are licensed and tagged, with appropriate alt text.

—Bloom6132 (talk) 15:05, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- @Bloom6132: - caption added with this edit. Can't believe I forgot that when you only flagged it up in my other FLC the other day..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:09, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries about it! —Bloom6132 (talk) 15:17, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support – all comments addressed. Looks to me like it meets all 6 FL criteria. Great work! —Bloom6132 (talk) 15:17, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I am participating in the WikiCup, and intend to claim points from the above review. —Bloom6132 (talk) 20:04, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks like they already got to everything. ~ HAL333 00:55, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source review – The reliability of the referencing looks fine throughout, and the link-checker shows no issues (it doesn't seem to like the Billboard links, but the ones I checked worked). ~~One formatting issue exists: refs 1 and 11 need en dashes to replace the hyphens in their titles for style.~~ Giants2008 (Talk) 21:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Giants2008: - done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:23, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With those quick fixes, I'd say the source review has been passed. Giants2008 (Talk) 17:30, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.