Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2016/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 30 August 2021 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2016 edit

Featured list candidates/List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2016/archive1

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everyone! With 72 of these lists now promoted to FL, here's what I hope will be #73. Notable events in this year include only the third song ever to enter the Hot Country Songs chart at #1, a superstar assemblage of country singers from multiple generations. As ever, I will respond as soon as possible to feedback...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support from HAL edit

Florida Georgia Line caption needs a period.
- Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comma needed before and Brett Eldredge topped Country
- Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is which topped both charts. supported by ref 8?
- No, but I didn't think that phrase needed a citation, as it's self-evident from the table..... - ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ah, okay. ~ HAL333 15:05, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's all. Great work as usual. ~ HAL333 22:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HAL333: - responses above :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to support. ~ HAL333 15:05, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Other reviews edit

Comments from Dank

Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
I fixed two double redirects, so you might want to check for other double redirects.
FLC criteria:
1. The prose is fine. The coding at the top of the table seems fine. I checked sorting on all columns and sampled the links in the table.
2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
4. It is navigable.
5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
6. It is stable.
Close enough for a support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 21:33, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support from Aoba47 edit

Everything looks good with this list. I made some very minor edits, which were very nitpick-y, but otherwise, I cannot find anything that requires further comments or revisions. I support the article for promotion. Have a great rest of your week! Aoba47 (talk) 17:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source review – Pass edit

Version reviewed – this – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

No issues.

Reliability

Seems fine to me. Most of the citations are from Billboard, appropriate for these type of lists.

Verifiability

Suggesting to archive all citations. This one was easy to check. Source review – pass – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.