Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard Latin Pop Airplay number ones of 1999/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Billboard Latin Pop Airplay number ones of 1999 edit

Featured list candidates/List of Billboard Latin Pop Airplay number ones of 1999/archive1

Nominator(s): Erick (talk) 03:42, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yeah! I remember the Latin pop explosion like it was yesterday. I've been looking forward to nominating 1999 Latin pop for a long time. Anyways, please leave any feedbacks and I'll gladly address them! Erick (talk) 03:42, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

"The first number one of the year was "Dejaría Todo" by Chayanne, which had been in the top spot since the issue dated December 12, 1998,[3] where it spent a total of seven weeks at this position and was named the best-performing Latin pop song of the year" => "The first number one of the year was "Dejaría Todo" by Chayanne, which had been in the top spot since the issue dated December 12, 1998;[3] it spent a final total of seven weeks at this position and was named the best-performing Latin pop song of the year"
"was followed by the release of his song, "Livin' la Vida Loca", and became an international success" => "was followed by the release of his song, "Livin' la Vida Loca", which became an international success"
"and was longest-running number one of the year" => "and was the longest-running number one of the year"
"where it spent six weeks on the latter chart" => "spending six weeks at number one on the latter chart"
"Iglesias also had the most chart-toppers in 1999 with two other songs" => "Iglesias also had the most chart-toppers in 1999, also reaching number one with two other songs"
"the latter a Spanish-language version of "Rhythm Divine" and final number one of the year" => "the latter a Spanish-language version of "Rhythm Divine" which was the final number one of the year"
Image caption: "He also had the most numbers of the year with three" => "He also had the most number ones of the year with three"
Image caption: "Chayanne had the first number one of the year with "Dejaría Todo" and was named the best-performing Latin pop song of the year." => "Chayanne had the first number one of the year with "Dejaría Todo", which was named the best-performing Latin pop song of the year."
"Millie Corretjer (credited as Millie)," - if that's true, shouldn't she be listed as that in the table?
Think that's it :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quick comment – "Corretjer was only the female artist to have more than one chart-topper...". "only" and "the" should be reversed here. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by AJona1992 edit

Wikilink crossover
In regards to Ricky Martin's song, please specify the type of success the song had
"Corretjer was only the female artist" - needs to be rewritten
That's all I have. – jona ✉ 18:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I now support this nomination after issues have been addressed. – jona ✉ 21:49, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude:, @Giants2008:, @AJona1992:, pinging all of three since I believe I took care of everything. Erick (talk) 18:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dank edit

Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
"|url-status=live" in the only "cite news" template was giving an error message (because you had already set the url-status); I removed it.
In the table, Luis Miguel should be sorting under "Miguel" (according to the defaultsort in his article). I don't personally have a position on this, but if the name is supposed to sort under "Luis", then change the defaultsort in his article (and let's see what happens), or start a discussion somewhere.
Checking the FLC criteria:
1. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. You've already got a couple of prose supports for the lead, so I'll leave that alone. I checked sorting on all sortable columns and sampled the links in the table.
2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
4. It is navigable.
5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
6. It is stable.
Close enough for a Support. Well done. I hope you'll consider reviewing ~~List of basal superasterid families or~~ List of early-diverging flowering plant families or (whenever I can nominate it) List of nitrogen-fixing-clade families. - Dank (push to talk) 22:28, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; promoting. --Pres N 13:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.